Kuruma v The Queen
Linked as:
Extract
Kuruma v The Queen
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
- Harris v DPP
- Lloyd v Mostyn
- R v Leatham
- Noor Mohamed v The King
- Calcraft v Guest
- Elias v Pasmore
- Fairley v Fishmongers of London
- Lawrie v Muir
- Rattray v Rattray
- H. M. Advocate v Turnbull
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- R v Joshua Jibunoh
- R v Keeton
- R v Vijay Kumar Bagga
- The State v Gobin and Griffith
- Herman King v The Queen
- R v Sacheverell Stanley Walton Houghton and Another
- Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
- John Anthony Helliwell and Others (Plaintiffs v Terry D. Piggott—sims (Defendant
- R v Frank Peter Heap
- R v Simon Lin and Others
- R v Cooke (Stephen)
- R v Carbello
- Waleed Haddara v The Queen
- Peter Norris Dupas v The Queen
- R v Shannon (John James)
- Police v Dunstall
- Heath v Government of the United States of America
- R v Apicella
- Spence v The Queen
- Imerman v Tchenguiz and Others
- R v Shaheed
- Karl Leslie Raymond Marwood v Commissioner of Police
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
- Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd v Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd;Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Ltd
- Spicer v Holt
- R v Selvey
- Movel (a pseudonym) v The King
- R v Sang
- R v Gibbins
- Dilbert v R (No. 2)
- Williams v Danmills Construction Ltd et Al
- Maycock Sr. v The Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
- Deokinanan v R
- Fritz Pinnock v Financial Investigations Division
- Roberto Ricardo Robinson v The Attorney-General
- Jemmott v Commissioner of Police
- The State v Nebblett
- Attorney General's Reference No. 1 of 2004 (Re Matthews et Al)
- R v Craigie et Al
- Re Thornhill; the Constitution of Trinidad & Tobago
- R v Manning et Al
- Maycock v Attorney General and Another; and related appeals
- R v Howard
- Deal et Al v the Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
- R v Howard
- Alexander v Comptroller of Customs
- R v Small
- Tiwarie v The State
- Chevalier v Attorney-General and Another
- Spence v R
- Phipps (Donald) v R
- Leslie McLeod v R
- R v Andrew
- R v Smith et Al
- Ramdatt v Rattan
- Laing v Commissioner of Police
- Carter et Al v The State
- Anthony Castelle v R
- Williams v Morales
- Todd v R
- The State v Plowell
- Khan and Others v The State
- Maycock Sr. v Attorney General et Al; Maycock Sr et Al v Attorney General et Al; Roberts and Moss v Attorney General et Al; Moore v Commissioner of Police; Curry v Commissioner of Police; Newbold v Commissioner of Police
- Martin v R
- Capital WW Investment Ltd v Tall Trade Ltd
- Pott v Avila
- Johnson v R
- The Queen v David Brandt
- Webb v R
- Terrence Thornhill v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
- Raeburn v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
- Meridian Investment Corporation et Al v Jamaica Export Credit Insurance Corporation et Al
- Nh International v Urban Development Corporation
- William Penn v The Queen
- Marcel Kelly v R
- Craig Dubidath v R
- DPP v McCutcheon
- Wayne Hamil v R
- Bacchus v Bissessar and Ramdai
- R v Tompkins
- A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
- Confidential Relationships (Preservations) Law (“CR(P)L”) (2009) Revision a Norwich Pharmacal Application
- Memory Corporation and Another v Sidhu and Another
- DPP v O'Brien
- The Queen v David Brandt
- Starcy Huggins v The Commissioner of Police
- Capital WW Investment Ltd ((in Liquidation)) acting through its Directors v Tall Trade Ltd
- Maycock et Al v Commissioner of Police
- Adnan Oliver v R
- R v King
- Raeburn v Attorney General
- Vignes s/o Mourthi v Public Prosecutor (No 3)
- The State v Corbin
- (1) Meridian Trust Company Ltd (2) American Associated Group Ltd Applicants v (1) Eike Fuhrken Batista Da Silva (Aka Eike Fuhrken Batista) (2) 63X Investments Ltd (3) 63X Fund (4) 63X Master Fund (5) Maples Corporate Services Ltd Respondents
- Imerman v Tchenguiz and Others
- David Baptiste v The State
- R v Walker
- Ferguson v The Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
- Roberts, Curry and Moss v The Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
- Moore and Newbold v The Superintendent of Prisons; the Attorney General and the Government of the United States of America
- Lockhart v the Superintendent of Prisons and the Attorney General
- The Government of the United States of America v Heath; Government of the U.S.A. v Matthew et Al
- Rahming v Commissioner of Police et Al
- Williams v Morales
- Chevalier v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago et Al
- Symbiote Investments Ltd v Minister of Science and Technology
- R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
- State v Gobin; State v Griffith
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Callis v Gunn
- King v The Queen
- Jeffrey v Black
- Fox v Chief Constable of Gwent
- R v K
- Clarkin v Attorney General
[See more]
REFERRED in
- R v Stevenson
- Spicer v Holt
- R v G and B
- Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz
- Public Prosecution Service v McKee; Public Prosecution Service v Elliott
- R v Christou ; R v Wright (Christopher)
- R v Michael Ivan Cooper
- Ajmer Singh v PP
- Lee Woon Tong; Wee Kang Whye and Another
- PP v Ooi Wei Yhee
- Public Prosecutor v Mohd Fazil bin Awaludin
- Kamarul Farkaruddin Mohamed v Public Prosecutor
- Mustapha bin Awang Besar v Pendakwa Raya
- Anamaly @ Anamalai a/l Mayivin Iwn Lim Ah Leak dan lain-lain
- Zulhisham Ayob and Another v Perunding Pakar Media Sdn Bhd
- Hassan Ali Basari v PP
- Mahmod Yary Mohammad and Others v Public Prosecutor
- Nanda Kumar Kunyikanan v Public Prosecutor
- Remely Hussain v Public Prosecutor
- PP v Tan Keng Siew
- Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
- Hue Chooi Yin (f) v Chew Pit King
- Public Prosecutor v Hassan bin Hj Ali Basri
- Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
- Walker v Lovell (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)
- Pp v Rengadorai Perumal and Others
- PP lwn Mohd Safwan Husain
- R v Khan (Sultan)
- Goi Ching Ang v PP
- Brandt v Commissioner of Police and Others (Montserrat)
- PP v Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Hj Abd Razak
- Dato' Sri Andrew Kam Tai Yeow v Raub Mining & Development Company Sdn Bhd and Another and Other Appeals
- Public Prosecutor v Zul Hassan
- Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v PP
- Benjamin William Hawkes v PP
- Twigg v The Queen
- Mr Syed Muzaher Naqvi v Solicitors Regulation Authority
- Serious Organised Crime Agency v Olden
- Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Sayed Reyadh Abdulla S Nasser Al Alawi and Others
- Jones v University of Warwick
- Morris v Beardmore
- Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1999); R v B
- Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Farhad Azima
- The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v J.C.
- Criminal Assets Bureau v Murphy
- Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis
[See more]
CITED in
- Wendo v R
- Driscoll v R
- Cleland v R
- Baker v Campbell
- Morris v R
- McNally v RG Manufacturing
- R v Shaheed
- Anamaly @ Anamalai a/l Mayivin Iwn Lim Ah Leak dan lain-lain
- Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)
- Telesystem Intl Wireless Inc. v CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners LP
- JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
- Paul Lashley John Campayne Appellants v Det. CPL. 17995 Winston Singh Respondent
- Warren v The State
- Webb v R 1995 Criminal App. No. 8A
- The State v Philip Plowell
- R v Cleveland Arnough
- Bent (Linel) v Eleanor Evans et Al
- Royal Gazette Ltd v Attorney General
- R v Outar (Roy), Jonathan Outar, Ralph Outar, Trevor Outar and Randal Titus
- Jamaica Teachers' Association v Marlon Francis and Others
- R v Mollison (Kurt)
- Re Braswell and Gero Vita International Inc. 2000 Civil Jur. No. 59
- Deokinanan v R
- DPP v Patrick Quirke
- Eric Llewellyn Jemmott Appellant The Commissioner of Police Respondent [ECSC]
- People v Lynch
- William Penn Appellant v The Queen Respondent
- A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
- DPP v Mallon
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
- Siew Soon Wah and Others v Yong Tong Hong
- Lee Woon Tong; Wee Kang Whye and Another
- Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd; Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
- Ramli Kechik v Public Prosecutor
- Cheng Swee Tiang v PP
- Anamaly @ Annamalai a/l Mayivin v Lim Ah Leak
- Yong Moi Sin v Kerajaan Malaysia
- Haji Kassim; PP
- PP v Tan Huang Hiang
- Noliana bte Sulaiman v PP
- Public Prosecutor v Lai Weng Keat
- Goi Chin Ang v Public Prosecutor
- Gan Ah Bee; PP
- PP v Seridaran
- Re Kah Wai Video (Ipoh) Sdn Bhd
- PP; Soh Ten Seng and Others
- Aizuddin Syah bin Ahmad v Public Prosecutor
- R; Saw Kim Hai and Another
- Heng Lee Handbags Company Pte Ltd and Another v Public Prosecutor
- Re Operation Tempura
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
