Noor Mohamed v The King

Core Citations

---

CITES

• Maxwell v DPP
• Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales
• R v Sims

COMMENTS

• Thompson v The King

APPROVES

• R v Bond

REFERRED in

• R v Hall
• R v Stevenson
• Public Prosecutor v Shee Chin Wah

[See more]

• R; RV Raju and Others
• Pendakwa Raya lwn Kow Liang Tiang
• King Seng Hock v Public Prosecutor
• Cheng Siak How v PP
• Chong Boo See; PP
• Forster Frank Edald Heinrich; PP
• GFL Ewin v PP
• Junaidi Bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor, SC
• Aziz Muhamad Din v Public Prosecutor
• Yee Wen Chin v Public Prosecutor
• Stubley v Western Australia
• Tan Meng Jee v Public Prosecutor
• DPP v PM
• Fox v Chief Constable of Gwent
• Kuruma v The Queen
• T v R
• R v McBride
• Warren v The State

CONSIDERED in

• R v Peter Richard Osborne
• The State v Gowkarran Persaud, Jowalla Persaud and Michael Boodram
• Outar v The State

[See more]

• Abdool Salim Yaseen and Thomas v The State
• The Queen v Richard James Blake
• R v Basant Samra
• R v Larman; R v Bowen; R v Jarrett
• McConney and Mohammed v R
• Pfennig v R
• Dill v R
• King v R
• R v Gordon et Al
• Herman King v The Queen
• McConney and Mohammed v R
• R v Christopher Willis and Others
• Webb v R
• R v Folbigg
• R v Mark Patrick Joyner and Others
• R v M. M
• DSJ v R
• Maycock v Attorney General and Another; and related appeals
• Waleed Haddara v The Queen
• The Queen v David Brandt
• Connell Richardson Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• R v Ngatikaura
• Dilbert v R (No. 2)
• Peter Norris Dupas v The Queen
• R v Defreitas Also Called Maliket Al (record of Proceedings Only)
• Jalipa v The State
• Myers, Brangman and Cox v The Queen
• Tacklyn v The Queen
• Mark Russell v R
• King v R
• The Queen v Kevin Patrick Gallagher
• Richardson v R
• Bentick v R
• Police v Dunstall
• Krm v R
• R v Matthew Michael Wainwright
• Soogrim et Al v The State
• The Queen v Peter Norris Dupas (No 3)
• R v Peter Richard Osborne
• R v McLeod
• Styles, Day, Carney and De Sousa v Attorney General
• H v The Attorney General
• U v The Attorney General
• The State v Lawrence Gopaul
• David Baptiste v The State
• The State v Phillip
• Dick et Al v R
• Director of Public Prosecutions v McHugh
• Chan v The State
• Maycock Sr. v Attorney General et Al; Maycock Sr et Al v Attorney General et Al; Roberts and Moss v Attorney General et Al; Moore v Commissioner of Police; Curry v Commissioner of Police; Newbold v Commissioner of Police
• Williams v R
• Outar v The State
• Lillie v Newcastle City Council
• Govia et Al v The State
• R v Fletcher
• The State v Corbin
• Rayon Williams v R
• Attorney General's Reference No. 1 of 2004 (Re Matthews et Al)
• Steward v R
• Alexander v The State
• R v Bryan James Turner
• The State v Nawaz Ali
• R v Powell
• Jeffery Peart v R Roxanne Peart
• The Director of Public Prosecutions v Cardenas-Ragoonanan et Al
• R v Selvey
• The Queen v David Brandt
• Yaseen All E.R v The State
• R v Larman; R v Bowen; R v Jarrett
• R v Sang (on Appeal from HM Court of Appeal (Criminal Division))
• R v Sang

APPLIED in

• R v Boardman
• Corke v Corke and Cook
• R v Boardman

CITED in

• Hunte (Wayne) v R
• Driscoll v R
• Sutton v R

[See more]

• Harriman v R
• Cox v R
• Webb v R 1995 Criminal App. No. 8A
• Phillip v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• DPP v O'Brien
• People v Lynch
• Misick and Others v The Queen (Turks and Caicos)
• Myers v The Queen Cox v Same Brangman v Same
• Pitman v The State (Trinidad and Tobago); Hernandez v The State (Trinidad and Tobago)

FOLLOWED in

• Perry v R
• Kan Sik Fong v PP
• Paneerselvan and Others; PP

[See more]

• Haji Kassim; PP
• Kesavan Petchayo v PP
• Cheng Siak How v PP
• Chong Boo See; PP
• PP; Rauf bin Haji Ahmad
• Forster Frank Edald Heinrich; PP
• PP; Tan Geok Kwang
• Goi Chin Ang v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Kang Ho Soh
• GFL Ewin v PP
• Goi Ching Ang v PP
• Datuk Haji Harun bin Haji Idris v PP

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Hashim v PP

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 65 TLR 134
• [1949] 1 All ER 365
• [1949] AC 182

DISTINGUISHED in

• PP v Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Hj Abd Razak
• DPP v Meleady (No 3)

APPROVED in

• R v Burke

CLARIFIED in

• Harris v DPP
• Harris v DPP