Re Kah Wai Video (Ipoh) Sdn Bhd

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Beardsley v Giddings
• Beardsley v Giddings

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Thorpe v Priestnall
• PP v Then Mee Kom and PP v Chan Kam Lai
• Elias v Pasmore

FOLLOWS

• Foo Loke Ying and Another v Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
• Herniman v Smith
• Hope v Evered

[See more]

• Kuruma v The Queen
• Codd v Cabe
• Truman (Frank) Export Ltd v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
• Galliard Appellant, Laxton Respondent
• Ghani v Jones
• Lea v Charrington
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• R v Lushington, ex parte Otto
• R v Rearden
• PP; Saminathan
• Osborne v London and North Western Railway Company
• Chic Fashions (West Wales) Ltd v Jones

REFERRED in

• N Indra P Nallathamby v Public Prosecutor
• Dato' Sreesanthan Eliathamby v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Hassan bin Hj Ali Basri

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1987] 2 MLJ 459

This document cites

• Chic Fashions (West Wales) Ltd v Jones
• Herniman v Smith
• Lea v Charrington
• Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
• Beardsley v Giddings



See all quotations

• Codd v Cabe
• Hope v Evered
• Beardsley v Giddings
• Galliard Appellant, Laxton Respondent
• Ghani v Jones
• R v Lushington, ex parte Otto
• PP v Then Mee Kom and PP v Chan Kam Lai
• Elias v Pasmore
• Foo Loke Ying and Another v Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
• Thorpe v Priestnall
• PP; Saminathan
• R v Rearden
• Osborne v London and North Western Railway Company
• Truman (Frank) Export Ltd v Metropolitan Police Commissioner