Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• R v Edward Coote
• Callis v Gunn
• R v Smith

[See more]

• R v Erdheim
• Kuruma v The Queen
• R v Barker
• R v Colpus. ; R v White
• R v Fennell
• R v Joyce
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd
• R v Thompson
• Leachinsky v Christie
• Sparks v The Queen
• Ibrahim v R
• Bingham v Bruce

CONSIDERS

• Purchase Tax Act 1963
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Finance Act 1946

[See more]

• Finance Act 1946 - Articles : S-20
• Purchase Tax Act 1963 - Articles : S-24
• Customs and Excise Act 1952 - Articles : S-4
• Bankruptcy Act 1914 - Articles : S-15
• Larceny Act 1916 - Articles : S-43
• Companies Act 1948 - Articles : S-167
• Purchase Tax Act 1963 - Articles : S-33
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907 - Articles : S-4

REFERRED in

• Re Farr (A E) Ltd
• Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission; Dunlop Olympic Ltd v Trade Practices Commission
• Re London United Investments Plc

[See more]

• E.M.I. Records Ltd v Spillane
• Annamalay Retnam v Mah Chong Peng
• Arab Malaysian Finance Bhd v Kah Motor Company Sdn Bhd
• Poh Kay Keong v Public Prosecutor
• Istel (AT & T) Ltd v Tully
• Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
• DPP v Ping Lin

CITED in

• The State v Abdool Azim Sattaur and Rafeek Mohamed
• A v Boulton
• Sorby v Commonwealth

[See more]

• R v Ronald Mapp
• Deokinanan v R
• R v K
• R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (No 1)

CONSIDERED in

• The State v Philip Plowell
• The State v Colin Joseph de France
• R v Ping Lin and Another

[See more]

• The State v Gobin and Griffith
• The Queen v Phillip Anthony Ella [FLR]
• The State v Chandree and Others
• Maycock v Attorney General and Another; and related appeals
• The State v Sattaur and Mohamed
• State v Gobin; State v Griffith
• The Queen v Craig Bertrand

APPLIED in

• A v HM Treasury
• Re Jeffrey S Levitt Ltd
• Bank of England v Riley and Another

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz

FOLLOWED in

• Tang Tuck Wah v Public Prosecutor
• Syed Yasser Arafat bin Shaik Mohamed v Public Prosecutor
• R v Rowe

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1966] 3 All ER 433
• [1966] 3 WLR 1241
• [1967] 1 AC 760

This document cites

• Leachinsky v Christie
• Wigley v Wigley
• R v Joyce
• Kuruma v The Queen
• R v Edward Coote



See all quotations

• R v Fennell
• Bingham v Bruce
• R v Erdheim
• R v Smith
• R v Benjamin Scott
• R v Parratt
• Sparks v The Queen
• R v Barker
• R v Thompson
• Ibrahim v R
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd
• R v Colpus. ; R v White
• Callis v Gunn
• Criminal Law Act 1826
• Finance Act 1946
• Purchase Tax Act 1963
• Criminal Appeal Act 1907
• Bankruptcy Act 1914
• Customs and Excise Act 1952
• Larceny Act 1916
• Companies Act 1948
• CENSUS GENERAL REGULATIONS, 1939, Dated January 10, 1939, Made by the MINISTER OF HEALTH UNDER SECTION 3 (1) OF THE CENSUS ACT, 1920 (10 & 11 GEO. 5. C. 41), FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING ANY ORDER IN COUNCIL DIRECTING THE CENSUS TO BE TAKEN, TO BE CARRIED INTO EFFECT.;THE CENSUS (Scotland) GENERAL REGULATIONS, 1939, Dated February 9, 1939, Made by the Secretary of State UNDER SECTION 3 (1) AS READ WITH SECTION 9 OF THE CENSUS ACT, 1920 (10 & 11 GEO. 5. C. 41), FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING ANY ORDER IN COUNCIL DIRECTING THE CENSUS TO BE TAKEN, TO BE CARRIED INTO EFFECT IN SCOTLAND.