Driscoll v R

Core Citations

---

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Thompson and Wran v R

REFERS TO

• Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales

CONSIDERS

• Ratten v R
• Mraz v (No 1)

CITES

• Taylor v R
• R v Oliva

[See more]

• Noor Mohamed v The King
• Harris v DPP
• Kuruma v The Queen

APPROVES

• Jackson v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 137 CLR 517
• 15 ALR 47

CONSIDERED in

• Liu v R; Lv v R
• Morris v R
• R v Giri

[See more]

• Arulthilakan v R;Mkoka v R
• Amorn Punna-Ophasi v The Queen [ACTCA]
• King v R
• Butera v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Vic)
• Pedro Perara-Cathcart(Appellant) v The Queen
• Samadi and Djait v R
• OKS v Western Australia
• Wilde v R
• R v Jacobs (No 6)
• R v J Taousanis
• Australian Crime Commission v Stoddart
• Police v Dunstall
• Paul Ian Lane(appellant) v Crown
• Collins v The Queen
• Hamide v R
• Cesan v The Queen
• Festa v R
• Kalbasi v Western Australia
• Grey v R
• Gilbert v The Queen
• Medich v R
• Gill v R
• Weiss v R
• R v Walker
• Tkwj v R

CITED in

• Pollard v R
• Cleland v R
• Harriman v R

[See more]

• Mcneill v the Queen
• Jago v District Court (Nsw)
• Osland v R
• Doney v R

REFERRED in

• Carr v R
• S v R
• Glennon v R

[See more]

• Kelly v R
• Public Prosecutor v Sng Siew Ngoh

DISTINGUISHED in

• Aytugrul v R

This document cites

---

• Harris v DPP
• R v Oliva
• Kuruma v The Queen
• Noor Mohamed v The King
• Makin v Attorney General for New South Wales



See all quotations

• Taylor v R
• Mraz v (No 1)
• Jackson v R
• Thompson and Wran v R
• Ratten v R