Walker v Lovell (on Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Road Traffic Act 1972 - Articles : S-6
• Road Safety Act 1967 - Articles : S-2
• Scott v Baker

[See more]

• Road Traffic Act 1972 - Articles : S-12
• Road Traffic Act 1972 - Articles : S-5
• Road Safety Act 1967
• Road Traffic Act 1972
• Road Traffic Act 1972 - Articles : S-8

REFERS TO

• Trebeck v Croudace
• Kuruma v The Queen
• Brennan v Farrell

[See more]

• R v Chapman
• Leachinsky v Christie
• R v Mitten
• Ledwith v Roberts
• Barnard v Gorman

CONSIDERS

• Barnard v Gorman
• Scott v Baker
• R v Thorpe (Thomas)

APPROVES

• Wiltshire v Barrett
• R v Holah

DOUBTS

• R v Thorpe (Thomas)

CITES

• Rendell v Hooper

APPLIES

• Webber v Carey ; DPP v Carey

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1975] UKHL J0716-1
• [1975] 3 All ER 107
• [1975] RTR 377

[See more]

• 67 CrAppR 249
• [1975] 139 JP 708
• [1975] 1 WLR 1141

This document cites

• R v Holah
• Leachinsky v Christie
• Wiltshire v Barrett
• R v Mitten
• R v Thorpe (Thomas)



See all quotations

• R v Chapman
• Barnard v Gorman
• Brennan v Farrell
• Trebeck v Croudace
• R v Thorpe (Thomas)
• Kuruma v The Queen
• Barnard v Gorman
• Webber v Carey ; DPP v Carey
• Scott v Baker
• Ledwith v Roberts
• Rendell v Hooper
• Scott v Baker
• Road Traffic Act 1972
• Road Safety Act 1967