Paul Lashley John Campayne Appellants v Det. CPL. 17995 Winston Singh Respondent

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Tyrone DA Costa Cadogan Applicant v The Queen Respondent
• Romeo Da Costa Hall Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• R v Ball

[See more]

• Ann Marie Boodram v The State

CITES

• R v da Costa Hall
• Bally Sheng Balson v The State
• Nudd v R

[See more]

• Cadogan (Tyrone) v R (No 2)
• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Bethel (Christopher) v The State (No. 2)
• Sutherland v The State
• Henry v The State
• Kuruma v The Queen
• Woolmington v DPP
• R v da Costa Hall
• Benjamin v R
• The State v Sydney

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2014] 5 LRC 649

CONSIDERED in

• Mark Wilson v R
• The King v Zita Shol
• Jerome Dixon v R

[See more]

• Kenyatha Brown v R
• Christopher Butler v R
• Linton Pompey v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Russell Samms v R
• Linton Pompey v The Director of Public Prosecutions
• Troy Barrett v R
• Daryeon Blake Vaughn Blake v R
• Craig Dubidath v R

This document cites

• Nudd v R
• Woolmington v DPP
• The State v Sydney
• R v Warickshall
• Kuruma v The Queen



See all quotations

• Bethel (Christopher) v The State (No. 2)
• R v Ball
• Tyrone DA Costa Cadogan Applicant v The Queen Respondent
• Teeluck and another v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Romeo Da Costa Hall Appellant v The Queen Respondent
• Sutherland v The State
• Cadogan (Tyrone) v R (No 2)
• R v da Costa Hall
• Benjamin v R
• Henry v The State
• R v da Costa Hall
• Ann Marie Boodram v The State
• Bally Sheng Balson v The State