Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Harz

CONSIDERS

• Finance Act 1946 - Articles : S-20
• R v Johnson

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Joyce

REFERS TO

• R v Gilham
• Callis v Gunn
• Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Cure & Deeley Ltd

[See more]

• Kuruma v The Queen
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
• Minister of Transport v Pettitt
• R v Smith
• Rumping v DPP
• Sparks v The Queen
• R v Gillyard
• R v Hammond (Leslie Walter)
• R v Leatham
• R v Erdheim
• DPP v Beard
• Pakala Narayana Swami v King-Emperor
• Leachinsky v Christie
• R v Coney
• R v Barker
• Radcliffe v Ribble Motor Services Ltd
• R v Colpus. ; R v White
• R v Lloyd
• R v Fennell
• Taylor v Witham; Witham v Taylor
• R v Jarvis
• R v Edward Coote
• R v William Baldry
• R v Benjamin Scott
• R v Warickshall
• R v Holmes
• R v Parratt
• R v Luckhurst
• R v Court
• R v Edmund Garbett

DOES NOT APPLY

• R v Manning

CITES

• R v Harris

APPLIES

• Ibrahim v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1967] 1 All ER 177
• [1967] 1 AC 760
• [1967] 2 WLR 297

CITED in

• A v Boulton
• The State v Philip Plowell
• The State v Colin Joseph de France

[See more]

• The State v Chandree and Others
• The State v Oswald Gobin and Boniface Griffith
• Deokinanan v R
• A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)

APPLIED in

• R v Harris (Richard)

REFERRED in

• R v Stevenson
• William Ovenell ; Walter A. Cartwright Ltd
• R v Prager

CONSIDERED in

• R v Robert Alan Keane
• Deokinanan v The Queen
• R v Ian McCartney

[See more]

• Morin v Director of Public Prosecutions
• Bank of England v Riley and Another
• Tofilau v The Queen
• Chimeka Gibbs v Director of Public Prosecutions
• The State v Lewis
• Prince et Al v The State
• R v Lincoln
• Maycock Sr. v Attorney General et Al; Maycock Sr et Al v Attorney General et Al; Roberts and Moss v Attorney General et Al; Moore v Commissioner of Police; Curry v Commissioner of Police; Newbold v Commissioner of Police
• R v Smith
• R v McIntosh
• Chandree et Al v The State
• State v Gobin; State v Griffith
• R v Sat-Bhambra (Ajit Singh)
• Re London United Investments Plc
• R v Hall
• R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (No 1)
• R v K
• DPP v Ping Lin
• R v Hasan (Aytach)

FOLLOWED in

• PP; Tang Tuck Wah

This document cites

---

• Leachinsky v Christie
• London Graving Dock Company Ltd v Horton
• R v Joyce
• R v Luckhurst
• R v Edmund Garbett



See all quotations

• R v Barker
• R v Coney
• R v Warickshall
• R v Jarvis
• R v Harris
• Kuruma v The Queen
• R v Edward Coote
• R v William Baldry
• R v Gillyard
• R v Leatham
• R v Hammond (Leslie Walter)
• R v Fennell
• R v Erdheim
• R v Court
• DPP v Beard
• R v Lloyd
• Minister of Transport v Pettitt
• R v Smith
• R v Benjamin Scott
• R v Parratt
• R v Manning
• Radcliffe v Ribble Motor Services Ltd
• Sparks v The Queen
• Taylor v Witham; Witham v Taylor
• Ibrahim v R
• Callis v Gunn
• R v Holmes
• Rumping v DPP
• Pakala Narayana Swami v King-Emperor
• R v Johnson