Pettitt v Pettitt

Core Citations

---

DOUBTS

• Appleton v Appleton

CONSIDERS

• Jansen v Jansen

REFERS TO

• Hine v Hine

CONSIDERS

• Bedson v Bedson
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Cobb v Cobb

[See more]

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949

REFERRED in

• RE Gorman (a Bankrupt) ex parte the Trustee of the Bankrupt v the Bankrupt and Another
• Parianos v Melluish (Trustee)
• Eldred Greenwood v Lisa Nicole Young/

[See more]

• Calverley v Green
• Cummins v the Trustees of the Property of John Daniel Cummins¸ A Bankrupt
• Robinson v Robinson
• Re Nicholson, decd
• Shinh v Shinh
• Fairbank v Lambeth MagistratesÆ Court
• Turton v Turton
• H v M (Property: Beneficial Interest)
• Hanlon v The Law Society
• Holman v Howes
• Cummins v the Trustees of the Property of John Daniel Cummins¸ A Bankrupt
• Suttill v Graham
• Leake (formerly Bruzzi) v Bruzzi
• Dennis v McDonald
• Goodman v Carlton
• Cooke v Head (No. 2)
• Michael v Michael
• Hamilton, Mildred Evandney v Morton Earle Hamilton
• Chintersingh (Nolda) v Alton Chintersingh
• Jeanne Maddern v Stevie Darlington
• Fredrika Sonia Ewen v Errol Augustus Ewen
• Vincent Lloyd Guthrie v Dorretta May Guthrie
• Dean Hinds v Janet Wilmot
• Audrey Ramona Chin v Lascelles Augustus Chin
• Stephenson (Robert) v Anderson (Carmelita)
• Ming, Hilda v Donald Ming
• Chin (Lascelles A.) v Chin (Audrey Ramona)
• Wang Shi Huah Karen v Wong King Cheung Kevin
• Tay Yok Swee v United Overseas Bank and Others
• Low Geok Khim (administratrix of the estate of Low Kim Tah, deceased) v Low Geok Bian and Others
• Teo Siew Har v Lee Kuan Yew
• Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
• Lee Hiok Tng (in her personal capacity) v Lee Hiok Tng and another (executors and trustees fo the estate of Lee Wee Nam, deceased) and Others
• Madiah bte Atan v Samsudin bin Budin
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland
• Melba Brown Claimant v George Brown Defendant [ECSC]
• La Tanya Hughes (Sole Executrix named in the last will and testament of Laban Hughes, deceased) Claimant v Clement Hughes Lawful Attorney of Ena Hughes Defendant [ECSC]
• Echinacash Inc. Appellant v Light Year Partners Llc First Respondent Elliotfriedman Second Respondent
• Gordon Clyne Claimant v Patricia Antoine-Clyne Defendant [ECSC]
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
• Timothy Stonich Appellant v Tamara Stonich Respondent
• E.N. v R.N.
• Andre Duffieldcottle Claimant v Myrtle Lucinda Williams Defendant [ECSC]
• Hardwick v Johnson
• Jones v Kernott
• Laskar v Laskar
• Stack v Dowden

CITED in

• Prentice v Cummins (No 6)
• Ungurian v Lesnoff
• Cornes v Cornes

[See more]

• Browne (formerly Pritchard) v Pritchard
• Morris v Morris
• Gibson v HM Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office
• Ronald Gibson v Lucianne Gibson
• Nelson (Carroll) v Leonardo Brown
• Prestwidge (Warren Izette) v Prestwidge (Valarie St. Elaine)
• Judith Newman v Nigel Newman
• Ramdeen (Claudette Ann-Marie) v Lloyd Augustus Ramdeen
• Plummer (Judith) v Andrew Plummer
• Archer (Donna Marie) v Archer (Henrick Valentine)
• Simpson (Beverley) v Anslyn Simpson
• Cornes v Cornes
• Victor Eugene Thompson and Terry Lynne Thompson v Clarence Victor Thompson
• Salome v Salome
• Kathleen Yolanda Vivian Smith v Rupert Earlston Smith 1993 Divorce Jur. No. 281
• Warren Rubaine v Samika King
• Rampersad & Rampersad v Edwards & Simmons
• Ivan Williams v Yvonne Thompson
• Alana Gray v Alvin Carley
• Charmaine Warner Nee Pemberton Petitioner v James Elvett Warner Respondent [ECSC]
• Crossco No.4 Unlimited and Others v Jolan Ltd and Others

CONSIDERED in

• Nelson and Another v Nelson and Others
• Low Gim Siah and Others v Low Geok Khim and Another
• Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA (The "Capaz Duckling")

[See more]

• McGill v Snodgrass
• Cupid v Thomas
• Williams v Williams
• Alvin Gregory Hodge v Marguerite Denise Hodge
• Proverbs v Proverbs
• Clarke (Petrona) v Rudley Clarke
• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Green (Vivia) v Roy Green
• Austin and Another v Austin
• Nembhard (Yvonne) v Winston Nembhard
• Goodison v Goodison
• Redhead v Redhead
• Forrest v Forrest
• Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy
• Abraham (Calvin Lenden) v Virginia Williams
• Barnes (Paul Wayne) v Richards-Barnes (Marjorie)
• McCalla (Grace) v Eric McCalla, Jenice McCalla and Jeffrey McCalla
• Barbara Jean Hobson (formerly McFadden) v Kenneth George Ewart
• Abbott v Abbott
• Gissing v Gissing

FOLLOWED in

• Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
• Law Tanggie v Untong ak Gantang and Another
• Ponniah v Sivalingam and Others

[See more]

• Noor Jahan Abdul Wahab v Md Yusoff Amanshah
• Foo Stie Wah; Neo Tai Kim
• Gray (Maud Lena) v Gray (Albert)
• Mason, Merle Adassa v Delton Rigg Mason
• Pryce (Lorna Angela) v Claude Alfanso Pryce
• Goodman v Gallant
• Pqr (Mw) v Str
• Lai Min Tet and Another v Lai Min Kin and Another and Another Application
• Lee Leh Hua v Yip Kok Leong
• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai
• Sin Sai Peng and Another v Soh Kim Lian Florence

APPLIED in

• MARK ANDREW PURSEGLOVE and DEBORAH SARGENT Third Party
• Bothe v Amos
• Bernard v Josephs

[See more]

• Findlay (Selwyn) v Ingrid Findlay
• Walker (Maxine) v Hiram Walker
• Kerr (Beverly Barbara) v Clyde Maxwell Fletcher
• George Blair v Emily Warmington
• McKenzie (Marguerite) and Anthony McKenzie
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Burns v Burns
• Romig Westerby Michael v Heather Michael

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] 1 All ER 1053
• [1968] 1 WLR 443

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Pettitt v Pettitt

REVERSED in

• Pettitt v Pettitt

DISTINGUISHED in

• Yeo Guan Chye Terence and another v Lau Siew Kim

COMMENTED in

• Jones v Kernott

This document cites

---

• Jansen v Jansen
• Hine v Hine
• Appleton v Appleton
• Cobb v Cobb
• Bedson v Bedson



See all quotations

• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Legal Aid and Advice Act 1949
• Married Women's Property Act 1882