RE Gorman (a Bankrupt) ex parte the Trustee of the Bankrupt v the Bankrupt and Another

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Cracknell v Cracknell

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Robinson v Robinson

REFERS TO

• Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Gissing v Gissing

[See more]

• Re Holliday (A Bankrupt)ex parte Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v Holliday
• Leake (formerly Bruzzi) v Bruzzi
• Bernard v Josephs

CONSIDERS

• Lowrie (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Trustee of the Bankrupt v The Bankrupt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1990] 2 FLR 284

CONSIDERED in

• Aubin Mckenzie v Leonard James Mckenzie
• Clarke v Harlowe
• Mitchell (nee Williams) v Mitchell

[See more]

• Stack v Dowden
• Wilcox v Tait

REFERRED in

• Sleebush (Deceased) and Others v Gordon and Others
• Abbey National Bank Plc v Stringer
• Goodman v Carlton

[See more]

• Andre Duffieldcottle Claimant v Myrtle Lucinda Williams Defendant [ECSC]
• Re Barcham (a bankrupt)

CITED in

• Miller-Weston v Miller and Another

CLARIFIED in

• Byford v Butler

This document cites

• Bernard v Josephs
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Cracknell v Cracknell
• Gissing v Gissing
• Re Holliday (A Bankrupt)ex parte Trustee of the Property of the Bankrupt v Holliday



See all quotations

• Leake (formerly Bruzzi) v Bruzzi
• Lowrie (A Bankrupt), Re, ex parte Trustee of the Bankrupt v The Bankrupt
• Robinson v Robinson
• Thames Guaranty Ltd v Campbell