Pqr (Mw) v Str

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Ann Ee Siong v Kim Taw Electric Sawmill Company (Pte) Ltd
• Lau Choong Choo v Chou We Chuan
• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Hine v Hine

REFERS TO

• Waterhouse v Waterhouse
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Eves v Eves

FOLLOWS

• Gissing v Gissing
• Bank of Montreal v Stuart
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others

[See more]

• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Steadman v Steadman
• Kings North Trust Ltd v Bell and Others
• Sengol v De Witt

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1992] SGHC 302
• [1993] 1 SLR 574

REFERRED in

• Chong Li Yoon v Soo Yook Thong
• Tan Poh Soon v Phua Sin Yin

This document cites

• Hine v Hine
• Steadman v Steadman
• Kings North Trust Ltd v Bell and Others
• Eves v Eves
• Pettitt v Pettitt



See all quotations

• Gissing v Gissing
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Bank of Montreal v Stuart
• Waterhouse v Waterhouse
• Ann Ee Siong v Kim Taw Electric Sawmill Company (Pte) Ltd
• Lau Choong Choo v Chou We Chuan
• Sengol v De Witt
• Tan Evelyn v Tan Lim Tai
• Enlistment Act 1970
• Employment Act 1968
• Interpretation Act 1965