Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Tinker v Tinker
• Re Bishop, deceased ; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others

[See more]

• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Gissing v Gissing

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy

REFERS TO

• Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
• Gooch, Re, Gooch v Gooch
• Cobb v Cobb

[See more]

• Stephenson (Robert) v Anderson (Carmelita)
• Gissing v Gissing
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset
• Nixon v Nixon
• Rose v Rose and Another
• Canadian and Dominion Sugar Company Ltd v Canadian National (West Indies) Steamships Ltd
• Bell v Marsh
• Longman v Bath Electric Tramways Ltd
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas

CONSIDERS

• Harris v Harris
• Pettitt v Pettitt

COMMENTS

• Lynch v Lynch

AFFIRMS

• Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2007] 3 JJC 3002

This document cites

• Nixon v Nixon
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Stephenson (Robert) v Anderson (Carmelita)
• Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy
• Tinker v Tinker



See all quotations

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Gissing v Gissing
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset and Others
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset
• Cobb v Cobb
• Gissing v Gissing
• Re Bishop, deceased ; National Provincial Bank Ltd v Bishop
• Harris v Harris
• Gooch, Re, Gooch v Gooch
• Longman v Bath Electric Tramways Ltd
• Canadian and Dominion Sugar Company Ltd v Canadian National (West Indies) Steamships Ltd
• Lynch v Lynch
• Neo Tai Kim v Foo Stie Wah
• Rose v Rose and Another
• Bell v Marsh