Appleton v Appleton

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Rawlings v Rawlings

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

CITED in

• Martin v Martin
• Wyatt v Wyatt
• B.L. v M.L.

REFERRED in

• Hayward v Hayward (Prestwood)
• Bedson v Bedson
• Bhura v Bhura

[See more]

• Nixon v Nixon
• Gissing v Gissing

CONSIDERED in

• Pinder v Pinder
• Hill v Hill
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).

[See more]

• Solomon v Solomon
• Jansen v Jansen
• Lundy v Lundy (nee Wilchcombe)
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Francois v Francois
• Burns v Burns

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1965] 1 All ER 44
• [1965] 1 WLR 25

DISTINGUISHED in

• Button v Button

DOUBTED in

• Pettitt v Pettitt

This document cites

• Rawlings v Rawlings
• Married Women's Property Act 1882