Appleton v Appleton

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Rawlings v Rawlings

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17

REFERRED in

• Hayward v Hayward (Prestwood)
• Bhura v Bhura
• Nixon v Nixon

[See more]

• Bedson v Bedson
• Gissing v Gissing

CONSIDERED in

• Jansen v Jansen
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
• Pinder v Pinder

[See more]

• Francois v Francois
• Lundy v Lundy (nee Wilchcombe)
• Solomon v Solomon
• Burns v Burns
• Hill v Hill
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).

DISTINGUISHED in

• Button v Button

CITED in

• Wyatt v Wyatt
• Martin v Martin
• B.L. v M.L.

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1965] 1 All ER 44
• [1965] 1 WLR 25

DOUBTED in

• Pettitt v Pettitt

This document cites

• Rawlings v Rawlings
• Married Women's Property Act 1882