Chin (Lascelles A.) v Chin (Audrey Ramona)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Campbell v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)
• Gissing v Gissing

[See more]

• Pettitt v Pettitt

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property (now known as Matrimonial Property) Act 1964
• Green v Green

REFERS TO

• Bookers Stores Ltd v Mustapha Ally
• Yuill v Yuill
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)

[See more]

• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Pettitt v Pettitt

CITES

• Nixon v Nixon
• Muetzel v Muetzel
• Azan v Azan

[See more]

• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Industrial Chemical Company (Jamaica) Ltd v Ellis

APPLIES

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Gissing v Gissing

FOLLOWS

• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Lascelles Augustus Chin v Audrey Ramona Chin

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2005] 12 JJC 2001

This document cites

• Campbell v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Nixon v Nixon
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis (Artemision II., Christina.)



See all quotations

• Benmax v Austin Motor Company Ltd
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Gissing v Gissing
• Muetzel v Muetzel
• Grant v Edwards and Another
• Gissing v Gissing
• Azan v Azan
• Abdool Hack v Rahieman
• Yuill v Yuill
• Green v Green
• Bookers Stores Ltd v Mustapha Ally
• Industrial Chemical Company (Jamaica) Ltd v Ellis