Cobb v Cobb

Core Citations

---

CITES

• Smith v Smith

REFERS TO

• Bull v Bull

APPLIES

• Rimmer v Rimmer

CONSIDERS

• Married Women's Property Act 1882 - Articles : S-17
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-36

CONSIDERED in

• Redhead v Redhead
• Jones v Jones
• Jones v Jones

[See more]

• Campbell v Campbell
• Tyson v Tyson et Al
• Repatriation Commission v Tsourounakis
• Bond v Bond
• Sterling (Barrington) v Zelta Gayle Sterling
• King v King
• Johnson (Sanida) v Clark (Roan)
• Nicolitsa Togias v State of New South Wales
• Short v Short
• Hill v Hill
• National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (A.P.).
• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Harris v Harris
• Johnson v Johnson; Johnson v Johnson
• Rahieman v Hack
• Bedson v Bedson
• Haynes v Berry
• Scatliffe v Scatliffe
• Raymond Lincoln Oliver Johnson v Angella Eunice Johnson
• Jackson v Jackson
• Atkinson v Atkinson
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation
• Pettitt v Pettitt
• Allen v Allen
• Gissing v Gissing

CITED in

• Chintersingh (Nolda) v Alton Chintersingh
• Hamilton, Mildred Evandney v Morton Earle Hamilton
• Walker (Maxine) v Hiram Walker

[See more]

• Mahabir v Mahabir
• Jemmott v Jemmott
• McCalla (Grace) v Eric McCalla, Jenice McCalla and Jeffrey McCalla
• Bhoorasingh (Awel Tetsa) v Harry George Bhoorasingh
• Barnes (Paul Wayne) v Richards-Barnes (Marjorie)
• B.L. v M.L.
• Bernard v Josephs

APPLIED in

• Owen (Pauline Eunice) v Alvin Burnett and Harold Green (Executors of the estate of Erin Mills Rock Owen, deceased)
• Hine v Hine
• Wilson v Wilson

REFERRED in

• Gray (Maud Lena) v Gray (Albert)
• Jackson v Jackson
• Samuels (Cecil Melburn) v Valrie Elaine Lowe-Samuels

[See more]

• Mitchell-Davy (Cecillia) v Riley Adolphus Davy
• Nagapushani v Nesaratnam and Another
• Lee Leh Hua v Yip Kok Leong
• Haddad (Peter) v Arlene Beverley Haddad
• Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland

RELIED UPON in

• Ming, Hilda v Donald Ming

DISTINGUISHED in

• Re Karuppiah
• Rawlings v Rawlings
• Jones v Challenger

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1955] 1 WLR 731
• [1955] 2 All ER 696

This document cites

---

• Bull v Bull
• Smith v Smith
• Rimmer v Rimmer
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Married Women's Property Act 1882