High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Four Categories of Persons Unknown

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 - Articles : S-68
• Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 - Articles : S-13
• Crossrail Act 2008

[See more]

• Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-12
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006 - Articles : S-3
• Highways Act 1980 - Articles : S-137
• Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 - Articles : S-111
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-37
• Crossrail Act 2008
• High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017
• Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017
• The High Speed Rail (West Midlands – Crewe) (Nomination) Regulations 2021
• High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Act 2021

CONSIDERS

REFERS TO

• Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Harper v G. N. Haden & Sons Ltd
• Graigola Merthyr Company v Swansea Corporation

[See more]

• Shelfer and Another v City of London Electric Lighting Company
• R (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence
• London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
• City of London v Samede and Others
• City of London v Samede and Others
• Olympic Delivery Authority v Persons Unknown
• Olympic Delivery Authority v Persons Unknown Engaged in Protest Activities Concerning the Use of Land Known as Porter's Field, Leyton Marsh, Lea Bridge Road, Leyton E10 7ql for the Purposes of the Construction of an Olympic Baseball Facility and Others
• Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
• Blue Holding (1) PTE Ltd v United States of America
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc (2) Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Ltd (3) Magellan Petroleum (UK) Ltd (4) Horse Hill Developments Ltd (5) UKOG (GB) Ltd v Persons unknown Who are Protestors against the Exploration and/or Extraction of Mineral Oil or Relative Hydrocarbon or Natural Gas by the Claimant(s) and Who are Involved in the Following Acts or any of them:
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• Cream Holdings Ltd and Others v Banerjee and another
• Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication)
• Parochial Church Council v Wallbank
• Richardson and another v DPP
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown
• Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land at Little Plumpton as More Particularly Described in the Claim form and Shown Edged Red on the Plan Annexed to the Claim Form
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• Hillingdon Borough Council v Persons Unknown Remaining or Occupytng wtthout Consent of the Claimant on the Claimant's Land
• Dr Larch Maxey v High Speed 2 Ltd
• Elliott Cuciurean v The Secretary of State for Transport
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• National Highways Ltd v Ana Heyatawin
• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown deliberately causing the blocking, slowing down, obstructing or otherwise interfering with the flow of traffic onto or off or along the strategic road network for the purpose of protesting and Others
• National Highways Ltd v Benjamin Buse
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Elliott Cuciurean
• R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
• The Secretary of State for Transport v Elliott Cuciurean
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd and Another v Persons Unknown and Others
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• National Commercial Bank Jamaica Ltd v Olint Corporation
• Paul (K.S.) (Printing Machinery) Ltd v Southern Instruments (Communications) Ltd
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• Manchester Airport Plc v Dutton and Others (Defendants/Applicants)
• DPP v Jones and Another
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd

CITES

• Hooper v Rogers
• National Highways Ltd v Arne Springorum

CONSIDERED in

• Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Scott Breen
• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• Three Counties Agricultural Society v Persons Unknown and Others

[See more]

• London City Airport Ltd v Persons unknown Who, in Connection with the Just Stop Oil or Other Environmental Campaign, Enter Occupy or Remain (Without the Claimants' Consent) Upon that Area of Land known as London City Airport (as Shown for Identification Edged Red on Plan 1) but Excluding those Areas of Land as Further Defined in the Claim Form
• Heathrow Airport Ltd v Persons Unknown Who (in Connection with Just Stop Oil or other Environmental Campaign) Enter, Occupy or Remain (Without the Claimant's Consent) Upon ‘London Heathrow Airport’ as is Shown Edged Purple on the Attached Plan a to the Particulars of Claim
• Thurrock Council v Madeline Adams

REFERRED in

• Bloor Homes Ltd v Julie Emerick Callow
• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• North Warwickshire Borough Council v David Baldwin

[See more]

• Transport for London v Persons Unknown
• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:
• Thurrock Council v Madeleine Adams

AFFIRMED in

• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd and Another v Persons Unknown and Others

CITED in

• Transport for London v Persons Unknown

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons (Ont.) et al., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 115 (CA)
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Manchester Airport Plc v Dutton and Others (Defendants/Applicants)
• Blue Holding (1) PTE Ltd v United States of America



See all quotations

• Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
• American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
• DPP v Jones and Another
• Hooper v Rogers
• City of London v Samede and Others
• Olympic Delivery Authority v Persons Unknown Engaged in Protest Activities Concerning the Use of Land Known as Porter's Field, Leyton Marsh, Lea Bridge Road, Leyton E10 7ql for the Purposes of the Construction of an Olympic Baseball Facility and Others
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• London Borough of Islington v Margaret Elliott and Another (Respondents/Claimants)
• City of London v Samede and Others
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Olympic Delivery Authority v Persons Unknown
• R (Tabernacle) v Secretary of State for Defence
• Paul (K.S.) (Printing Machinery) Ltd v Southern Instruments (Communications) Ltd
• Shelfer and Another v City of London Electric Lighting Company
• Graigola Merthyr Company v Swansea Corporation
• Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Soltau v De Held
• Harper v G. N. Haden & Sons Ltd
• Crossrail Act 2008
• London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006
• Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
• Compulsory Purchase Act 1965
• Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017
• Highways Act 1980
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Magistrates' Courts Act 1980
• Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication)
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Lawrence (Katherine) and Another v Fen Tigers Ltd & others (No 1)
• Parochial Church Council v Wallbank