Thurrock Council v Madeleine Adams

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Local Government Act 1972
• Highways Act 1980
• Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999

[See more]

• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-222
• Police and Justice Act 2006
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-12
• Highways Act 1980 - Articles : S-137
• Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 - Articles : S-111
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-3
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Highways Act 1980
• Local Government Act 1972
• Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 1999
• Police and Justice Act 2006

CONSIDERS

• Harrison v Duke of Rutland
• Cooper v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

REFERS TO

• DPP v Jones and Another
• Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council and another
• Hooper v Rogers

[See more]

• Nagy v Weston
• Harper v G. N. Haden & Sons Ltd
• Lowdens v Keaveney
• City of London v Samede and Others
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor
• Michael Buchanan v The Crown Prosecution Service
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) v Ministry of Justice; R (on the application of AM) v DPP
• R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2)
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• SC and 3 Children v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• R (on the application of Z and another) v Hackney London Borough Council and another
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Four Categories of Persons Unknown
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v London Gypsies and Travellers and Others
• Valero Energy Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• Exolum Pipeline System Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Not Used
• Jockey Club v Persons unknown
• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• S v L
• Hirst v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
• East Hertfordshire DC v Isabel Hospice Trading Ltd sub nom East Hertfordshire DC v Isobel Hospice Trading Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Thurrock Council v Madeline Adams