Extract
DPP v Jones and Another
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
RESUELVE RECURSO
CITES
CONSIDERS
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
-
An Appeal by way of Case Stated and Another v DPP
-
Derbyshire County Council v High Peak Magistrates' Court Ms Kate Marlow (Interested Party)
-
Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[See more]
-
An Appeal by way of Case Stated and Another v DPP
-
Mowan v London Borough of Wandsworth and Another
-
Kelly Minio-Paluello v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
-
T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council and Another
-
Malcolm Scott v Mid-South Essex Justices and Osman Keskin
-
Kvelde v State of New South Wales
-
National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
-
National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
-
Stephen Birch v DPP
-
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Others v Price
-
Minto v Police
-
City of London v Samede and Others
-
Herrick and another v Kidner and Somerset County Council
-
Gayadeen and another v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
-
Gavan Michael McFadzean v Wayne Andrew Benson
-
Cambridge City Council v Traditional Cambridge Tours Ltd
-
Westminster City Council v Haw
-
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council
-
Michael Buchanan v The Crown Prosecution Service
-
Edward Walsh and Another v County Council for County of Sligo
-
Walsh & Cassidy v Sligo County Council
-
R (Smith) v The Land Registry
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
Thurrock Council v Madeline Adams
-
Robert James Brown and Another(Plaintiffs) v The State of Tasmania
-
Fiona James v Director of Public Prosecutions
-
R (on the application of SG and Others (previously JS and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
-
City of London v Samede and Others
-
Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council
CITED in
REFERRED in