South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• South Buckinghamshire District Council v Coates and Others
• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council

REFERS TO

• South Buckinghamshire District Council v Coates and Others

APPLIES

• Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown and Others

CONSIDERS

• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons Unknown
• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-187B

[See more]

• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6

DISTINGUISHES

• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)

CONSIDERED in

• Wychavon DC v Connors and Rafferty and Another
• King's Lynn & West Norfolk Council v Persons Unknown
• Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb and Others

[See more]

• Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb and Others
• Ilyas v Aylesbury Vale District Council
• R ((1) Josephine O'Brien & Christine O'Brien (2) Josephine Casey (3) John & Kathleen Berry (4) Patrick & Margaret Doran (5) Deborah Killeaney) v Basildon District Council
• Mid-Bedfordshire District Council v Brown
• Ashford Borough Council v David Stevens (1)
• JS (by her litigation friend KS) v Cardiff City Council
• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• Elliott Cuciurean v Secretary of State for Transport
• The King on the application of ZOS v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kharajan Arshad Fathula Mohammad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Vastint Leeds B.v (a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands) v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of a Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds
• MBR Acres Ltd -v- Free the MBR Beagles
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• Mace Ltd v Persons Unknown Entering in or Remaining at the 40 Leadenhall Street Construction Site Without the Claimants' Permission

REFERRED in

• Sarah Coates v Dartford Borough Council
• Maidstone BC v Goliea Brazil
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another

[See more]

• Ineos Upstream Ltd v Persons unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form
• North Warwickshire Borough Council v David Baldwin
• Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v AC and Others
• East Hertfordshire District Council v Thomas Doherty and 18 Others
• The Secretary of State for Transport v Elliott Cuciurean
• Kharajan Arshad Fathula Mohammad v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Four Categories of Persons Unknown
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• Elliott Cuciurean v The Secretary of State for Transport
• National Highways Ltd v Kirin and Others
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v London Gypsies and Travellers and Others

CITED in

• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• Elliott Cuciurean v Secretary of State for Transport
• UK Oil & Gas Investments Plc (2) Kimmeridge Oil & Gas Ltd (3) Magellan Petroleum (UK) Ltd (4) Horse Hill Developments Ltd (5) UKOG (GB) Ltd v Persons unknown Who are Protestors against the Exploration and/or Extraction of Mineral Oil or Relative Hydrocarbon or Natural Gas by the Claimant(s) and Who are Involved in the Following Acts or any of them:

[See more]

• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• MBR Acres Ltd -v- Free the MBR Beagles
• Mace Ltd v Persons Unknown Entering in or Remaining at the 40 Leadenhall Street Construction Site Without the Claimants' Permission
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 31/10/2005 Daily Cases
• [03/11/2005] TLR 1
• [2006] 1 WLR 658

RELIED UPON in

• MBR Acres Ltd v Gillian Frances McGivern

This document cites

---

• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
• Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown and Others
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons Unknown
• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)
• South Buckinghamshire District Council v Coates and Others



See all quotations

• South Buckinghamshire District Council v Coates and Others
• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998
• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)
• Human Rights Act 1998