London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-187B
• Equality Act 2010

[See more]

• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-37
• Equality Act 2010
• Covid-19 Credit Guarantee Scheme 2020
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another

REVERSES

• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown

REFERS TO

• London Borough of Enfield v Persons Unknown
• Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land at Little Plumpton as More Particularly Described in the Claim form and Shown Edged Red on the Plan Annexed to the Claim Form
• ICTS (UK) Ltd v Anthony Visram

[See more]

• Jacobson v Frachon
• Daniel Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd
• Starmark Enterprises Ltd v CPL Enterprises Ltd
• Burris v Azadani
• Hubbard v Pitt
• Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown and Others
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc
• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons Unknown
• Dresser UK Ltd v Falcongate Freight Management Ltd (Sub nom Duke of Yare)
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• Barton v Wright Hassall LLP
• Vastint Leeds B.v (a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands) v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of a Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) (No 2)
• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)
• Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v Meier and Others
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar

CITED in

• National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• Buckinghamshire Council v Jimmy Barrett
• Shell UK v Persons Unknown

CONSIDERED in

• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown
• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
• Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council v Shane Heron and Others

[See more]

• National Highways Ltd v Kirin and Others
• Waverley Borough Council v Anthony Martin Gray
• Transport for London v Persons Unknown
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• Exolum Pipeline System Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown
• London Borough of Havering v William Stokes
• Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Scott Breen
• Shell v PUs & Ireland & Laurie

APPLIED in

• The National Highways Ltd v Persons Unknown

REFERRED in

• Ineos Upstream Ltd v Persons unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form
• National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown Causing the Blocking of, Endangering, or Preventing the Free Flow of Traffic on the M25 Motorway, A2, A20 and A2070 Trunk Roads and M2 and M20 Motorway, A1(M), A3, A12, A13, A21, A23, A30, A414 and A3113 Trunk Roads and the M1, M3, M4, M4 Spur, M11, M26, M23 and M40 Motorways for the Purpose of Protesting
• Esso Petroleum Company, Ltd v Scott Breen

[See more]

• Thurrock Council v Martin Stokes
• MBR Acres Ltd v Gillian Frances McGivern
• Arla Foods Ltd v Persons Unknown Who are, without the Consent of the Claimants, Entering or Remaining on Land and in Buildings on Any of the Sites Listed in Schedule 2 of the Claim Form (“The Sites”), Those Being:
• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v Persons Unknown and Others
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Four Categories of Persons Unknown
• Shell v Persons Unknown

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2022] 4 All ER 51
• [2022] 2 WLR 946
• [2023] QB 295

AFFIRMED in

• Wolverhampton City Council and Others v London Gypsies and Travellers and Others

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Barton v Wright Hassall LLP
• Burris v Azadani
• The Queen (on the Application of A) v The Secretary of State for Health NHS Blood and Transplant (Interested Party)



See all quotations

• Dresser UK Ltd v Falcongate Freight Management Ltd (Sub nom Duke of Yare)
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Hubbard v Pitt
• Davis and Others v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
• Starmark Enterprises Ltd v CPL Enterprises Ltd
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown and Others
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Persons Unknown
• Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc
• Jacobson v Frachon
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
• Venables and Thompson v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Town and Country Planning Act 1990
• Equality Act 2010
• South Buckinghamshire DC v Porter (No 1)
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening)
• Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v Meier and Others
• Manchester City Council v Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) (No 2)
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Bromley v Persons Unknown
• Cuadrilla Bowland Ltd and Others v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land at Little Plumpton as More Particularly Described in the Claim form and Shown Edged Red on the Plan Annexed to the Claim Form
• Vastint Leeds B.v (a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands) v Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant on Land and Buildings Comprising Part of a Development Site Known as the Former Tetley Brewery Site, Leeds
• (1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
• Daniel Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• ICTS (UK) Ltd v Anthony Visram
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• London Borough of Enfield v Persons Unknown