Extract
National Highways Ltd v Persons unknown deliberately causing the blocking, slowing down, obstructing or otherwise interfering with the flow of traffic onto or off or along the strategic road network for the purpose of protesting and Others
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
-
DPP v Jones and Another
-
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
-
City of London v Samede and Others
[See more]
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
-
Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
-
Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
CONSIDERED in
CITED in
REFERRED in
This document cites
-
Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
-
Khan v. College of Physicians and Surgeons (Ont.) et al., (1992) 57 O.A.C. 115 (CA)
-
Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Nora Ziegler
-
American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd
See all quotations
-
DPP v Jones and Another
-
City of London v Samede and Others
-
Infrastructure Act 2015
-
Highways Act 1980
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
-
Human Rights Act 1998
-
Courts Act, 1981
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others