North Warwickshire Borough Council v David Baldwin

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Local Government Act 1972 - Articles : S-222
• Localism Act 2011 - Articles : S-1
• Highways Act 1980 - Articles : S-130

[See more]

• Shops Act 1950
• Crime and Disorder Act 1998 - Articles : S-17
• Control of Pollution Act 1974 - Articles : S-60
• Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
• Children Act 1989
• Police and Justice Act 2006 - Articles : S-27
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-12
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Highways Act 1980 - Articles : S-137
• Housing Act 1985 - Articles : S-152
• Human Rights Act 1998
• Children Act 1989
• Shops Act 1950
• Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
• The Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations 2015
• Supreme Court (now known as Senior Courts) Act 1981 - Articles : S-37

CONSIDERS

REFERS TO

• Stoke-on-Trent City Council v B & Q (Retail) Ltd
• Attorney General v Chaudry
• Nottingham City Council v Zain (A Minor)

[See more]

• Hall v Beckenham Corporation
• Attorney General v Premier Line Ltd
• Attorney General v Sharp
• Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Ltd
• Attorney General v Harris
• City of London Corporation v Bovis Construction Ltd
• Manchester City Council v Lawler
• Birmingham City Council v Shafi and another
• Hampshire Waste Services Ltd v Intending Trespassers upon Chineham Incinerator Site
• Hall and Others v Mayor of London (on Behalf of the Greater London Authority)
• City of London v Samede and Others
• Birmingham City Council v Gavin James The SEcretary of State for the Home Department (Intervener)
• Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc [QBD (Comm)]
• Bloomsbury Publishing Plc and Another v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
• Manchester Ship Canal Developments Ltd and Another v Persons Unknown and Others
• London Borough of Croydon v Persons Unknown
• Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Company Ltd
• Joseph Boyd v Ineos Upstream Ltd & 9 Others
• Birmingham City Council v Mr Shakeel Afsar
• Cream Holdings Ltd and Others v Banerjee and another
• R (L) v Westminster City Council (MIND and another intervening)
• Florica Alina Dulgheriu v The London Borough of Ealing
• Canada Goose UK Retail Ltd and another v Persons Unknown and another
• The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hackney v Persons unknown in London Fields, Hackney (The ‘Prescribed Area’) Who Are:
• The Secretary of State for Transport v Elliott Cuciurean
• The Queen (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport
• London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
• MBR Acres Ltd v Free the MBR Beagles (formerly Stop Animal Cruelty Huntingdon) (an unincorporated association by its representative Mel Broughton on behalf of the members of Free the MBR Beagles who are protesting within the area marked in blue on the Plan attached at Annex 1 of the Claim Form and/or engaging in unlawful activities against the Claimants and/or trespassing on the First Claimant's Land at MBR Acres Ltd, Wyton, Huntingdon PE28 2DT and/or posting on social media images and details of the officers and employees of MBR Acres Ltd, and the officers and employees of third party suppliers and service providers to MBR Acres Ltd)
• Sharif v Birmingham City Council
• Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and Others
• High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd v Four Categories of Persons Unknown
• Three Counties Agricultural Society v Persons Unknown and Others
• MBR Acres Ltd -v- Free the MBR Beagles
• Birmingham City Council v Afsar and Others
• Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd
• Transport for London v Lee and Others
• Wychavon District Council v Midland Enterprises (Special Events) Ltd
• Burris v Azadani
• Hubbard v Pitt
• Langley and Others v Liverpool City Council and Another
• South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell; Bromley London Borough Council v Maughan
• Kent County Council v Batchelor (No. 2)
• Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
• Runnymede Borough Council v Ball
• Attorney General v Bastow

CITES

• Worcestershire County Council v Tongue
• Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd

APPLIES

• American Cyanamid Company v Ethicon Ltd