Edgar v Edgar

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• O'D v O'D
• Dipper v Dipper

APPLIES

• Wright v Wright
• Hyman v Hyman

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1963 - Articles : S-5

CITED in

• JP v NP
• T v R (Maintenance after remarriage: agreement)
• Roocroft v Ball (Personal Representative of Carol Ann Ainscow)

[See more]

• F v M
• R v R
• SA v PA
• Range v Range
• Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng
• B v C (Consequential Directions to a Consent Order)
• Melissa Jackson (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Etate of Michael John Sheridan) v Jian Song
• North v North
• T v T

CONSIDERED in

• K v K
• Blooman v Blooman
• Beryl Ann Kay (Petitioner) Appellant) v Edward Kay Respondent)

[See more]

• L v M
• Smith v Smith
• Jean Bernadette Stephenson v Melvyn Douglas Stephenson
• John Stuart Cairns Muir v Andrena Aitken Muir
• Beach v Beach
• Vernon v Vernon
• Hill v Morgan
• N v N
• Williams v Thompson, Leatherdale and Francis
• Tibbs v Dick
• Susan Mary Roe (Petitioner v David Robert Roe (Respondent
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• TQ v TR
• M v L (Financial Relief After Overseas Divorce)
• G v G (Financial Provision: Separation Agreement)
• J v J
• Warwick (Andrea) v Trustee in Bankruptcy of Clive Graham Yarwood
• D v D (Financial Provision)
• ADS v DSM and Others
• J v K
• G v H
• A v A
• Melissa Jackson (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Etate of Michael John Sheridan) v Jian Song
• Z v Z
• Dr Petitioner v Kr Respondent
• DR v KR
• DL v KL
• Kuni Marie Frith Swan v Alexander Winston Joseph Swan
• Persad v Persad
• Flores v Flores
• Persad v Persad
• Malloo v Malloo
• Algoo v Algoo
• Stephenson-James v James
• Davidson v Timal
• N (Sj) v O'D (Pc)
• N (Sj) v O'D (Pc)
• Malloo v Malloo
• Fitzgerald George v Burnette Barry-George
• Deborah J. Lang Petitioner v Peter W. Lang Respondent [ECSC]
• W.A v M.A (Divorce)
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
• Tanz v Tanz
• Hadeed v Hadeed

FOLLOWED in

• Richardson v Richardson (No 2)
• A v B (Financial Relief: Agreements)
• Choo Tzit Howe (L) v Tham Pik San (P)

[See more]

• Lim Thian Kiat v Teresa Hae Sook Lim
• Ling Pooi Ming; Ong Ah Mai
• Cook v Cook
• Surindar Singh s/o Jaswant Singh v Sita Jaswant Kaur

APPLIED in

• DN v HN
• Benson v Benson (Deceased)
• Pierburg v Pierburg

[See more]

• Harris v Manahan
• Caroline Louise Hopkins v William Ian Hopkins
• Ruth Irma Rodriquez Morales Pino v Reinaldo Pino Bestard
• MacLeod v MacLeod

DISTINGUISHED in

• Evans v Evans
• Camm v Camm

REFERRED in

• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• TW v PL (Agreement)
• S v S

[See more]

• Re Goh Hoe Ling
• Thirupathy a/l Muniandy v Bintumathy a/p Ramakrishnan
• Karen Young v Ng Tia Ching
• Horohoe v Horohoe
• Russell Haley v Kelly Haley
• Rose v Rose (Divorce: Consent Orders) (No.2)
• Rose v Rose
• S v S (Arbitral Award: Approval) [Family Division]
• BN v MA
• Walkden v Walkden
• Xydhias v Xydhias
• Hill and another v Haines
• KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement: Needs)
• Chia Hock Hua v Chong Choo Je
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
• Soulsbury v Soulsbury

RELIED UPON in

• N v N (Consent Order: Variation)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1980] 3 All ER 887
• [1981] 2 FLR 19
• [1980] 1 WLR 1410

This document cites

---

• Wright v Wright
• Dipper v Dipper
• O'D v O'D
• Hyman v Hyman
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973



See all quotations

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1963