Rose v Rose (Divorce: Consent Orders) (No.2)

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Rose v Rose (Divorce: Consent Orders) (No.2)

CONSIDERS

• Family Proceedings Rules 1991

REFERS TO

• Edgar v Edgar
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Barder v Caluori

[See more]

• Stewart v Engel and another

CITES

• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)

FOLLOWS

• N v N and L

REFERRED in

• AB v CD
• Antje Kicinski v Peterpaul Pardi
• KG (Proposed Appellant) v LG (Proposed Respondent)

CONSIDERED in

• N v N
• Rose v Rose (Divorce: Consent Orders) (No.2)
• Myerson v Myerson

[See more]

• North v North
• Re T (Abduction: Protective Measures: Agreement to Return)
• Re A HA v MB (Brussels II revised: article 11(7) application)

FOLLOWED in

• Foster v Foster

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] 1 FLR 978
• [14/03/2002] TLR 4

This document cites

• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Barder v Caluori
• Edgar v Edgar
• Stewart v Engel and another



See all quotations

• De Lasala v De Lasala
• N v N and L