Camm v Camm

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Hyman v Hyman

DISTINGUISHES

• Edgar v Edgar

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1983] 4 FLR 577

REFERRED in

• K v K
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• Hill v Morgan

[See more]

• S v S (Arbitral Award: Approval) [Family Division]
• Ruth Irma Rodriquez Morales Pino v Reinaldo Pino Bestard
• Kuni Marie Frith Swan v Alexander Winston Joseph Swan
• Kathleen Yolanda Vivian Smith v Rupert Earlston Smith 1993 Divorce Jur. No. 281

CONSIDERED in

• Richardson v Richardson (No 2)
• Smith v Smith
• Doreen Ivy Tibbs Jason Ronald Tibbs v Hugh Beresford-webb and Another

[See more]

• Jean Bernadette Stephenson v Melvyn Douglas Stephenson
• John Stuart Cairns Muir v Andrena Aitken Muir
• Tibbs v Dick
• Susan Mary Roe (Petitioner v David Robert Roe (Respondent
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)

FOLLOWED in

• B v B (Consent Order: Variation)
• A v B (Financial Relief: Agreements)
• Chia Hock Hua v Chong Choo Je

APPLIED in

• Harris v Manahan

This document cites

• Edgar v Edgar
• Hyman v Hyman
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973