Xydhias v Xydhias

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Arthur J S Hall & Company (Respondent/Plaintiff) v Melvyn Keith Simons
• Pagnan S.p.A. v Feed Products Ltd
• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)

[See more]

• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Edgar v Edgar
• Foley v Classique Coaches

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Kelley v Corston
• Peacock v Peacock

CONSIDERED in

• Blooman v Blooman
• Cox v Cox
• TW v PL (Agreement)

[See more]

• KENNETH McDonald WOOD v JAYNE PATRICE ROST
• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• Almeida v Almeida
• Warwick (Andrea) v Trustee in Bankruptcy of Clive Graham Yarwood
• MB v KB
• Re A HA v MB (Brussels II revised: article 11(7) application)
• C v D
• H v J
• NG v KR (Pre-nuptial Contract)
• Melissa Jackson (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Etate of Michael John Sheridan) v Jian Song
• Melissa Jackson (as Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Etate of Michael John Sheridan) v Jian Song
• Hill and another v Haines
• DR v KR
• Gertude Lawrence v Joseph Lawrence
• Soogrim v Singh
• Soogrim v Singh
• Flores v Flores
• Persad v Persad
• Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
• MacLeod v MacLeod

APPLIED in

• DN v HN
• G v S
• DW (First Appellant) CW (Second Appellant) v CG

REFERRED in

• X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
• S v S
• Williams v Fairbairn

[See more]

• I v I (Divorce: Ancillary relief)
• Sharland v Sharland
• Russell Haley v Kelly Haley
• S v S (Arbitral Award: Approval) [Family Division]
• Sofia Bogolyubova v Gennadiy Bogolyubov
• BN v MA
• Community Care North East v Durham County Council
• Sharland v Sharland
• Independent Trustee Service Ltd v GP Noble Trustees and Others

CITED in

• S v S (Ancillary Relief: Consent Order)
• Financial Dispute Resolution Appointments- Best Practice Guidance
• Hughmans (A Firm) v Alexandra Dunhill

[See more]

• R v R
• Dr Petitioner v Kr Respondent
• Sharon Minkin v Lesley Landsberg (Practising as Barnet Family Law) (Respondent/Defendant)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Myerson v Myerson
• Re T (Abduction: Protective Measures: Agreement to Return)
• Soulsbury v Soulsbury

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1999] 2 All ER 386
• [1999] 1 FLR 683
• [1999] 1 Fam CR 289

[See more]

• [13/01/1999] TLR 2

This document cites

• Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)
• Arthur J S Hall & Company (Respondent/Plaintiff) v Melvyn Keith Simons
• Kelley v Corston
• Rush & Tompkins Ltd v Greater London Council
• Edgar v Edgar



See all quotations

• Calderbank v Calderbank
• Peacock v Peacock
• Foley v Classique Coaches
• De Lasala v De Lasala
• Pagnan S.p.A. v Feed Products Ltd
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973