X v X (Y and Z Intervening)

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-1
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25

[See more]

• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 - Articles : S-15

REFERS TO

• N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-nuptial agreement)
• B v B (Financial Provision)
• Berkovits v Grinberg (Attorney General Intervening)

[See more]

• Brett v Brett
• Browne v Browne
• Camm v Camm
• Dean v Dean
• Re Strafford (Earl of) deceased
• Edgar v Edgar
• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)
• G v G (Financial Provision: Separation agreement)
• Hope v Hope
• Howard v Howard
• Joseph v Joseph
• J v J
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Smith v McInerney
• Sutton v Sutton
• Thomas v Thomas
• White v White
• John Wright Henniker Wilson v William Carr Foster, Nathan Wetherell and Mary Wright Henniker Wilson
• Wright v Wright
• Xydhias v Xydhias
• Amey v Amey

CITES

• N v N (Divorce: Agreement not to Defend)
• Wilson v Wilson
• Hyman v Hyman

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] 1 FLR 508

REFERRED in

• S v S
• S v S (Arbitral Award: Approval) [Family Division]
• NG v KR (Pre-nuptial Contract)

[See more]

• MacLeod v MacLeod
• Tini Owens v Hugh John Owens

CITED in

• R v R
• Dr Petitioner v Kr Respondent
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino

[See more]

• R.G v G.G (Divorce)

CONSIDERED in

• D v D (Financial Provision)
• A v A
• Price-Jones v Commerzbank AG

[See more]

• DR v KR
• Suzette Elizabeth Powery v Clint Otis Powery
• Fitzgerald George v Burnette Barry-George
• Flores v Flores
• Stephenson-James v James
• Davidson v Timal

This document cites

• Wright v Wright
• Joseph v Joseph
• White v White
• Camm v Camm
• Re Strafford (Earl of) deceased



See all quotations

• Brett v Brett
• Thomas v Thomas
• Jenkins v Livesey (formerly Jenkins)
• Edgar v Edgar
• Browne v Browne
• Hyman v Hyman
• J v J
• Howard v Howard
• John Wright Henniker Wilson v William Carr Foster, Nathan Wetherell and Mary Wright Henniker Wilson
• G v G (Financial Provision: Separation agreement)
• Wilson v Wilson
• B v B (Financial Provision)
• N v N (Jurisdiction: Pre-nuptial agreement)
• Smith v McInerney
• Berkovits v Grinberg (Attorney General Intervening)
• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)
• Hope v Hope
• Dean v Dean
• Xydhias v Xydhias
• N v N (Divorce: Agreement not to Defend)
• Sutton v Sutton
• Amey v Amey