Z v Z

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Wells v Wells

REFERS TO

• Otobo v Otobo
• Z v Z (Divorce: Jurisdiction)
• Dart v Dart

APPLIES

• White v White
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino

CITES

• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)

CONSIDERS

• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
• Edgar v Edgar
• Rodney Charles Wells v Jane Fiona Wells [CA (Civil), 20/03/2002]

[See more]

• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-25
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975

CITED in

• Ah (Petitioner) v Ph
• Pauline Siew Phin Chai v Tan Sri Dr. Khoo Kay Peng and Others

CONSIDERED in

• B v S
• NM v PM
• Camilla Eva Carin Versteegh v Gerard Mikael Versteegh

[See more]

• KA v MA (Prenuptial Agreement: Needs)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2012] 1 FLR 1100

REFERRED in

• Dominika Anita Gabrielsson Brack v Per Cenny Brack

This document cites

• Otobo v Otobo
• White v White
• Rodney Charles Wells v Jane Fiona Wells [CA (Civil), 20/03/2002]
• Edgar v Edgar
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino



See all quotations

• Dart v Dart
• F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets)
• Wells v Wells
• Z v Z (Divorce: Jurisdiction)
• Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
• Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino