Dipper v Dipper

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 - Articles : S-23

REFERS TO

• Smith v Smith
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Mills v Mills

[See more]

• Hyman v Hyman
• Griffiths v Griffiths

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Dunford v Dunford

APPLIES

• Carter v Carter

DISTINGUISHES

• Ottley v Morris
• Minton v Minton

CONSIDERED in

• Jane v Jane
• R v R
• Thompson v Thompson

[See more]

• Nasrin Taj Kolattek (Respondent (Petitioner) (Wife) v Freimut Reiner Kolattek (Appellant (Husband)
• Re "S" (Minors)
• N v N
• Richardson v Richardson
• Leslie Collette Veney-Smith v Mclaren Herbert Cecil Smith
• Barrett v Barrett
• Williamson v Williamson
• Farrington v Farrington
• Maskort v Maskort
• Moree v Moree Jr
• J v L and N
• Dixon v Dixon
• Roopsingh v Roopsingh
• Coleman v Coleman
• Green v Green
• Sonia Cheetham Brow v Darren William Brow
• Penn (nee Roach) v Penn and Knowles
• Mohammed v Mohammed
• Maharaj v Maharaj
• Lmp v Maj
• L v L
• L.C.H. v S.J.H.J.
• Seepersad v Seepersad
• Ellison v Ellison
• Sonia Cheetham Brow v Darren William Brow
• Page v Page [1981]
• Collens v Collens
• Miller v Miller (Short Marriage: Clean break)
• R.C. v B.C
• Amanda Whittingham v Collin S. Whittingham

CITED in

• Brown v Brown
• North v North

FOLLOWED in

• H v H (Financial Provision: Short Marriage)
• Whiting v Whiting
• L v L

REFERRED in

• L v L (Financial Provision)
• G. v G. (Periodical Payments)
• Cook v Cook

[See more]

• Fraser v Fraser
• Harman v Glencross and Another
• Edgar v Edgar
• Re Aliya Aziz Tayabali

APPLIED in

• Re Carlson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1980] 2 All ER 722
• [1980] 1 FLR 286
• [1980] 3 WLR 626

[See more]

• [1981] FAM 31

This document cites

---

• Griffiths v Griffiths
• Smith v Smith
• Wachtel v Wachtel
• Minton v Minton
• Hyman v Hyman



See all quotations

• Dunford v Dunford
• Carter v Carter
• Mills v Mills
• Ottley v Morris
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1973