Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• Garthwaite v Garthwaite
• Gray (orse. Formosa) v Formosa

[See more]

• Har-Shefi v Har-Shefi
• Hayward v Hayward (Prestwood)
• Indyka v Indyka
• Kassim (orse. Widmann) v Kassim (orse. Hassim) (Carl and Dickson cited)
• Abate v Abate (orse. Cauvin)
• Adams v Adams
• Aldrich v Attorney General (Rogers Intervening)
• Black-Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg A.G.
• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
• Leon v Leon
• Mansell v Mansell
• Merker v Merker
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
• Re Meyer
• Porter v Porter
• Quazi v Quazi
• Qureshi v Qureshi
• Ramsay-Fairfax (orse Scott-Gibson) v Ramsay-Fairfax
• Ross Smith v Ross Smith
• Rowe v Rowe
• Sinclair v Sinclair
• Thompson v Thompson
• Torok v Torok
• Travers v Holley
• Miles v Chilton (orse. Miles)
• De Reneville v De Reneville
• Salvesen v Administrator of Austrian Property
• Woodland v Woodland
• Lindsay v Lindsay
• White otherwise Bennett v White
• Wilkins v Wilkins
• Armytage v Armytage
• Pemberton v Hughes
• Varanand v Varanand
• Raeburn v Raeburn
• Mehta (orse. Kohn) v Mehta
• Orlandi v Castelli
• Aldridge v Aldridge
• Sim v Sim
• Graham v Graham
• Conradi v Conradi
• Bright v Bright

CONSIDERS

• Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 - Articles : S-8

CITES

• Silver (orse. Kraft) v Silver
• Collett v Collett
• Kenward v Kenward

APPLIES

• Henderson v Henderson
• Ogden v Ogden
• Sottomayer v De Barros (No. 2)

APPROVES

• Law v Gustin (formerly Law)
• Perrini v Perrini

REFERRED in

• R v Immigration appeal tribunal ex parte Rafika Bibi
• X City Council v MB, NB and MAB [FD]
• Talbot v Berkshire County Council

[See more]

• NB v MI
• Toh Seok Kheng v Huang Huiqun
• Ng Bee Hoon v Tan Heok Boon
• Kwong Sin Hwa v Lau Lee Yen
• Kelly v Ireland
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)
• Soleimany v Soleimany
• Johnson v Gore Wood & Company (A Firm)

CITED in

• X City Council v MB and Others
• W v W (Nullity)
• City of Westminster Social and Community Services Department v C and another

[See more]

• R Saddiq v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
• Mbebe's application (Nonzukiso)
• Wilkinson v Kitzinger and Another (Same-sex marriage)

CONSIDERED in

• Maples (Formerly Melamud) v Melamud; Maples (Formerly Melamud) v Maples
• Colin Mckenzie Curtis v Celia Ann Curtis
• Kuni Marie Frith Swan v Alexander Winston Joseph Swan

[See more]

• Liao Eng Kiat v Burswood Nominees Ltd
• Izmailovic &; Ads v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána and Others

DISTINGUISHED in

• R Saddiq v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Westminster City Council v C and Others

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1981] 2 WLR 901
• [1981] FAM 77

APPLIED in

• Man (E. D. & F.) (Sugar) Ltd v Yani Haryanto (No. 2)

FOLLOWED in

• Tan Ah Thee v Lim Soo Foong

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith

AFFIRMED in

• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith