Ng Bee Hoon v Tan Heok Boon

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• A v J (Nullity Proceedings)
• Jodla v Jodla
• Kaur v Singh

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Tan Siew Choon v Tan Kai Ho

REFERS TO

• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
• Morgan v Morgan (orse. Ransom)
• Santos v Santos

FOLLOWS

• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
• Brodie v Brodie

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1992] SGHC 41
• [1992] 2 SLR 112

REFERRED in

• Tang Yuen Fong v Poh Wee Lee Jerry
• Lsj v Lkk

FOLLOWED in

• Tan Ah Thee v Lim Soo Foong
• Toh Seok Kheng v Huang Huiqun

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Kwong Sin Hwa v Lau Lee Yen

This document cites

• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
• Santos v Santos
• Kaur v Singh
• A v J (Nullity Proceedings)
• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith



See all quotations

• Brodie v Brodie
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
• Jodla v Jodla
• Morgan v Morgan (orse. Ransom)
• Kelly (orse Hyams) v Kelly (1932)
• Tan Siew Choon v Tan Kai Ho