Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
Linked as:
Extract
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (Directions: Existence of East Germany); Rayner & Keeler Ltd v Courts & Company
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
RESUELVE RECURSO
APPLIES
- Aksionairnoye Obschestvo A. M. Luther v Sagor & Company
- Taylor v Barclay
- Berne (City of) v Bank of England
DISTINGUISHES
- Monta of Genoa v Cechofracht Company (The Marilu)
- Kawasaki Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha of Kobe v Bantham S.S. Company
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
- Westfal-Larsen & Company A/S v Ikerigi Compania Naviera S.A. (Messiniaki Bergin)
- G S Technology Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
- Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Ltd v Taylor
[See more]
REFERRED in
- Bacal Contracting Ltd v Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd
- Saffron v Commissioner of Taxation
- Ascot Commodities N.v v Northern Pacific Shipping (No. 2) (Irini A)
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Charm Maritime Inc. v Kyriakou
- Quall v Northern Territory of Australia
- Good Challenger Navegante SA v Metalexportimport SA
[See more]
CITED in
- Rogers v R
- R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex parte Hackney London Borough Council
- R East Hertfordshire District Council v The First Secretary of State
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
APPEAL RESOLVED in