Kassim (orse. Widmann) v Kassim (orse. Hassim) (Carl and Dickson cited)

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Sinha Peerage Claim
• Mehta (orse. Kohn) v Mehta
• Ford v Stier

[See more]

• Bruce against Burke
• Bowzer, as Guardian of his Son v Ricketts
• Har-Shefi v Har-Shefi
• Kenward v Kenward
• Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee
• Baindail (orse. Lawson) v Baindail
• De Reneville v De Reneville

DISTINGUISHES

• Watson v Jones or McEwan et è contra

CITED in

• Fitzgerald v Fitzgerald
• M-T (Petitioner) v T

REFERRED in

• Bateman v Bateman
• Akhter v Khan (Attorney General intervening)
• Annie Tan Huay Lian; Lawrence Au Poh Weng and Another

[See more]

• Au Poh Weng Lawrence and Another v Tan Huay Lian Annie
• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
• SA (by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)
• NB v MI
• Ap v Jp and Another
• Manouchehr Shilani Tousi v Natalya Gaydukova
• Manouchehr Shilani Tousi v Natalya Gaydukova

CONSIDERED in

• Collett v Collett
• The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nasim Akhtar
• SA (by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)

[See more]

• Majda Asaad v Zeyto Kurter
• Fitzgerald v Fitzgerald
• J v S-T (Formerly J) (Transsexual: Ancillary Relief)
• The Attorney-General v Matus
• Manouchehr Shilani Tousi v Natalya Gaydukova

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1962] 3 WLR 865
• [1962] 3 All ER 426
• [1962] P 224

APPLIED in

• Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) (No.1)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Hudson v Leigh (Note) [Family Division]

This document cites

• Har-Shefi v Har-Shefi
• Watson v Jones or McEwan et è contra
• Baindail (orse. Lawson) v Baindail
• Bowzer, as Guardian of his Son v Ricketts
• De Reneville v De Reneville



See all quotations

• Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee
• Kenward v Kenward
• Mehta (orse. Kohn) v Mehta
• Bruce against Burke
• Ford v Stier
• Sinha Peerage Claim
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998