Perrini v Perrini

Core Citations

---

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Padolecchia v Padolecchia (orse. Leis)

REFERS TO

• Radwan v Radwan (No. 2)
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig

[See more]

• Sottomayer v De Barros (No. 2)
• Sottomayor v De Barros

CITES

• Mather v Mahoney

APPLIES

• Indyka v Indyka
• Law v Gustin (formerly Law)
• Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott

FOLLOWS

• Pugh v Pugh

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1980] 1 FLR 53
• [1979] 2 All ER 323
• [1979] Fam 84

[See more]

• [1979] 2 WLR 472

CONSIDERED in

• Lawrence v Lawrence
• Nazia Parveen v Assim Balal Hussain

APPROVED in

• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith

REFERRED in

• Iver Salvesen+mrs. Wendy Salvesen For Extension Of The Time Within Which Charges May Be Registered In The Register Of Charges Under Section 420 Of The Companies Act

CITED in

• Westminster City Council v C and Others

This document cites

---

• Indyka v Indyka
• Law v Gustin (formerly Law)
• Radwan v Radwan (No. 2)
• Pugh v Pugh
• Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)



See all quotations

• Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig
• Sottomayer v De Barros (No. 2)
• Padolecchia v Padolecchia (orse. Leis)
• Mather v Mahoney
• Sottomayor v De Barros