Messina (formerly Smith orse. Vervaeke) v Smith (Messina intervening)

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Mountbatten v Mountbatten

REFERS TO

• Mountbatten v Mountbatten
• Munt v Munt
• Robinson-Scott v Robinson-Scott

[See more]

• Travers v Holley
• Attorney General for Alberta v Cook
• Le Mesurier v Le Mesurier
• Armitage v Attorney General. Gillig v Gillig
• Shaw v Gould
• Wilson v Wilson
• Bowie (or Ramsay) v Liverpool Royal Infirmary
• Lord Advocate v Jaffrey
• Blair v Blair
• Chard v Chard
• Indyka v Indyka
• Mather v Mahoney

APPLIES

• Indyka v Indyka

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1971] 2 All ER 1046
• [1971] 3 WLR 118
• [1971] P 322

REFERRED in

• Perrini v Perrini
• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
• Ho Ah Chye v Hsinchieh Hsu Irene

CONSIDERED in

• Symonette v Symonette
• Nazia Parveen v Assim Balal Hussain
• Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith

FOLLOWED in

• Ng Bee Hoon v Tan Heok Boon