Simpson v Simpson

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-2
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1937 - Articles : S-9
• Matrimonial Causes Rules, 1950

[See more]

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Owners of SS. "Hontestroom" v Owners of SS. "Sagaporack."

DISAPPROVES

• Boyd v Boyd

DOUBTS

• Hosegood v Hosegood

CITES

• Westall v Westall
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Squire v Squire

[See more]

• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Lauder v Lauder
• Kelly v Kelly
• Mytton v Mytton
• Bethune v Bethune
• Sickert v Sickert
• Derry and Others v Peek
• Jones v Hulton (E.) & Company
• Thomas v Thomas
• Everitt v Everitt
• Angel v Angel
• Evans v Evans
• Walmsley v Walmsley
• Usmar v Usmar
• Horton v Horton

APPLIES

• Buchler v Buchler
• Clark v Clark

FOLLOWS

• Edwards v Edwards

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1951] P 320
• 1 TLR 1019
• [1951] 1 All ER 955

[See more]

• [1951] 115 JP 286

REFERRED in

• Carpenter v Carpenter
• Wright v Wright
• Bartholomew v Bartholomew

[See more]

• Crawford v Crawford
• A-G, Malaysia and Others; Louis Blom-Cooper
• Lang v Lang
• Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)
• Waters v Waters

CITED in

• Deery v Deery
• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Gollins v Gollins

DISTINGUISHED in

• Eastland v Eastland

APPLIED in

• Cade v Cade

FOLLOWED in

• A-G, Malaysia and Others; Louis Blom-Cooper

CONSIDERED in

• Saunders (Nee Sherman) v Saunders
• Young, Sr. v Young

This document cites

---

• M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Owners of SS. "Hontestroom" v Owners of SS. "Sagaporack."
• Derry and Others v Peek
• Hosegood v Hosegood



See all quotations

• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Kelly v Kelly
• Lauder v Lauder
• Angel v Angel
• Evans v Evans
• Westall v Westall
• Everitt v Everitt
• Squire v Squire
• Buchler v Buchler
• Thomas v Thomas
• Edwards v Edwards
• Clark v Clark
• Mytton v Mytton
• Sickert v Sickert
• Usmar v Usmar
• Horton v Horton
• Boyd v Boyd
• Jones v Hulton (E.) & Company
• Bethune v Bethune
• Walmsley v Walmsley