Lang v Lang

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Lang v Lang

REFERS TO

• Bartholomew v Bartholomew
• Simpson v Simpson
• Koch v Koch

[See more]

• Garcia v Garcia
• Farmer v Farmer
• Pike v Pike (Note)

CONSIDERS

• Baily v Baily
• Deery v Deery
• Moss v Moss

[See more]

• Sickert v Sickert
• Buchler v Buchler
• Edwards v Edwards
• Hosegood v Hosegood

CITES

• Boyd v Boyd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1954 1110 PCA A
• [1954] PCA 1110 A
• 31 TLR 467

[See more]

• [1954] 3 All ER 571
• [1954] 3 WLR 762
• [1955] AC 402

APPLIED in

• Ingram v Ingram
• Hall v Hall
• Hutchinson v Hutchinson

[See more]

• Saunders v Saunders
• Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)
• Waters v Waters

REFERRED in

• Slon v Slon
• Ward v Ward
• Baker v Baker

[See more]

• Fishburn v Fishburn
• Howard v Howard
• Knott v Knott
• Deery v Deery
• Marsden v Marsden
• Ogden v Ogden
• Hutchinson v Hutchinson
• W. v W. (No. 2)
• Cade v Cade
• Haynes v Haynes and Sawkill
• SL (A Juvenile) v DPP
• Moorgate Mercantile Company Ltd v Finch and Read

CONSIDERED in

• Sharah v Sharah
• Re Shine
• Ernest Arnold Siebs v Evelyn Willis Siebs

[See more]

• Parbati Durga v Ralph Baijnauth Durga
• Delph v Delph
• Birjah v Birjah
• Siebs v Siebs
• Hyam v DPP
• Gollins v Gollins
• Hubert Vernica Hutchinson Petitioner/Respondent v Wilma Avril Hutchinson Respondent/Cross-Petitioner [ECSC]

DISTINGUISHED in

• Magaard v Magaard
• Gollins v Gollins

RELIED UPON in

• Marjoram v Marjoram

CITED in

• The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and W
• Barnett v Cortinas-Ferrer
• Delph v Delph

This document cites

---

• Pike v Pike (Note)
• Hosegood v Hosegood
• Moss v Moss
• Buchler v Buchler
• Bartholomew v Bartholomew



See all quotations

• Simpson v Simpson
• Edwards v Edwards
• Deery v Deery
• Farmer v Farmer
• Sickert v Sickert
• Koch v Koch
• Boyd v Boyd
• Garcia v Garcia
• Baily v Baily