Gollins v Gollins

Core Citations

---

DISAPPROVES

• Cox v Cox
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Eastland v Eastland

CONSIDERS

• King v King
• Horton v Horton

[See more]

• Hall v Hall
• Evans v Evans
• Lang v Lang

REFERS TO

• Lauder v Lauder
• Squire v Squire
• Westall v Westall

[See more]

• Wright v Wright

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1937
• Lang v Lang
• Harriman v Harriman

[See more]

• King v King
• Jamieson v Jamieson

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Gollins v Gollins

CITES

• Buchler v Buchler
• Crawford v Crawford
• Simpson v Simpson

[See more]

• Usmar v Usmar
• Cooper v Cooper (No. 1)

DISTINGUISHES

• Waters v Waters
• Cade v Cade

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1963] UKHL J0627-1
• [1963] 2 All ER 966
• [1963] 3 WLR 176

[See more]

• [1964] AC 644

CONSIDERED in

• Sheppard (Petitioner) v Sheppard (Respondent)
• Perkins (Née Routier) v Perkins
• E.H.J v K.S.J

[See more]

• T.D v P.D
• Wagner v Wagner
• G v Q
• E.O.D. v V.E.D.
• Llewlyn v Llewlyn
• Mortier v Mortier
• Leslie v Leslie
• Thompson v Thompson
• C. L v M.M.L
• C. H v M.M.H
• P.A.A v C.A
• D.R v B.R
• J.H.W v C.W
• Durga v Durga
• Jones v Jones et Al
• Barrow v Barrow
• Margarita Myrtle Louis-Octave v Hamilton Octave
• Kendall Owin Dornellien v Dyane Dornellien (nee Sebastian)
• K v B

REFERRED in

• Lim Nyun Yin v Gan Kim Biow
• Elsie Koh Chen Chee and Another; Koh Teng Lam
• Kiranjit Kaur Kalwant Singh v Chandok Narinderpal Singh

[See more]

• HOLLEY v SYVRET [Royal Ct]
• URQUHART v WALLACE [CA (Jersey)]
• Tini Owens v Hugh John Owens

COMMENTED in

• SKILLETT v FARAMUS [Royal Ct]

CITED in

• Cms Petitioner v Rgs Respondent
• Roe v Roe
• Barrow v Barrow

[See more]

• Webster v Webster

This document cites

---

• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)
• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Wright v Wright
• King v King
• Hall v Hall



See all quotations

• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Harriman v Harriman
• Lauder v Lauder
• Buchler v Buchler
• Evans v Evans
• Simpson v Simpson
• Westall v Westall
• Lim Yak Hua v Eastern & Oriental Hotel
• The Right Hon Lionel William John, Earl of Dysart against The Right Hon
• Squire v Squire
• Waters v Waters
• Cooper v Cooper (No. 1)
• Cox v Cox
• Crawford v Crawford
• King v King
• Lang v Lang
• Usmar v Usmar
• Horton v Horton
• Lang v Lang
• Eastland v Eastland
• Cade v Cade
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1937
• Legal Aid Act 1960