Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Lang v Lang

REFERS TO

• Simpson v Simpson
• Cox v Cox
• Walker v Walker

[See more]

• Green v Green & Partridge

APPLIES

• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Lauder v Lauder
• King v King

[See more]

• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Lang v Lang

CITES

• Squire v Squire

DISTINGUISHES

• Davis v Davis

CONSIDERS

• Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950 - Articles : S-31

FOLLOWED in

• Gollins v Gollins

APPLIED in

• Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1962] 1 All ER 776
• [1963] P 25
• [1962] 2 WLR 1056

CONSIDERED in

• E.H.J v K.S.J
• Wagner v Wagner
• Gollins v Gollins

This document cites

---

• Jamieson v Jamieson
• King v King
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Lauder v Lauder
• Green v Green & Partridge



See all quotations

• Simpson v Simpson
• Davis v Davis
• Squire v Squire
• Walker v Walker
• Cox v Cox
• Lang v Lang
• Lang v Lang
• Matrimonial Causes Act 1950
• Judicial Proceedings (Regulation of Reports) Act 1926