Wright v Wright

Core Citations

CITES

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas

APPLIES

• Scott v Scott
• Squire v Squire

CONSIDERS

• Ivett v Ivett
• Cooper v Cooper (No. 1)
• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-6

[See more]

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-5

DISTINGUISHES

• Birch v Birch
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky

REFERS TO

• Bosworthick v Bosworthick
• Boyd v Boyd
• Ivens v Ivens

[See more]

• King v King
• Hadden v Hadden
• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Simpson v Simpson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1960] 1 All ER 678
• [1960] 104 SJ 249
• [1960] 2 WLR 499

[See more]

• [1960] P 85

REFERRED in

• Robinson v Robinson
• Cadogan v Cadogan
• Faith Panton Property Plan Ltd v Hodgetts

[See more]

• Gollins v Gollins

This document cites

• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• King v King
• Scott v Scott
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky



See all quotations

• Bosworthick v Bosworthick
• Simpson v Simpson
• Squire v Squire
• Cooper v Cooper (No. 1)
• Hadden v Hadden
• Ivens v Ivens
• Ivett v Ivett
• Boyd v Boyd
• Birch v Birch