Everitt v Everitt

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925 - Articles : S-31

DISAPPROVES

• Lodge v Lodge

CITES

• Re Giles. Real and Personal Advance Company v Michell
• Ousey v Ousey
• Fitzgerald v Fitzgerald

[See more]

• Mounger and Clare
• Basing v Basing
• West v West
• Forbes v Forbes
• Re Skinner's Trusts
• Marsh v Marsh
• Manners v Manners & Fortescue
• Petty v Petty
• Peek v Peek
• Smith v Smith
• Boyd v Bischoffsheim
• Harman (Martin Coles) v Official Receiver, etc
• Craig v Kanssen
• Woolfenden v Woolfenden
• Pardy v Pardy
• Synge v Synge

APPLIES

• Hopes v Hopes
• Glenister v Glenister
• Thomas v Thomas

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1948] 2 All ER 545
• [1948] WN 237
• 65 TLR 121

[See more]

• [1949] 113 JP 279
• [1949] P 374

REFERRED in

• Allen v Allen
• Prince v Prince
• Howard v Howard

[See more]

• Brennan v Brennan
• Baker v Baker
• Wells-King v Wells-King
• Chilton v Chilton
• Kemp v Kemp
• Brannan v Brannan
• Purse v Purse
• Boothe (Errol) v Cheketa Boothe
• M v P (Queen's Proctor intervening)

CITED in

• Simpson v Simpson
• Lane v Lane
• Dennis v Dennis

[See more]

• Gibson v Gibson
• Tam-Kai v Tam-Kai

DISTINGUISHED in

• Edwards v Edwards

CONSIDERED in

• Keith Sajiv Manchanda (Petitioner/Respondent) v Donna Barbara Manchanda (Respondent/Appellant)
• R Hill v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
• Walker v Wlaker

[See more]

• Seepersad v Jhilmit
• Gibson v Gibson
• Stephenson v Stephenson

APPLIED in

• Stevens v Stevens
• Wiseman v Wiseman