Holmes v DPP

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Holmes v DPP

AFFIRMS

• Holmes v DPP

DISAPPROVED in

• R v Martindale

APPLIED in

• R v Cunningham
• R v McCarthy (Michael Dennis)
• Bedder v DPP

REFERRED in

• Masciantonio v R
• Mcghee v R
• Johnson v R

[See more]

• Stingel v R
• Othman Mat v PP
• Public Prosecutor v Lee Fook
• PP; Vijayan
• Hill v Baxter
• R v Walker
• Hyam v DPP
• DPP v McNamara
• Vijayan v Public Prosecutor
• Cyrille Edwards Appellant v The State Respondent [ECSC]

NOT APPLIED in

• Phillips v The Queen

CITED in

• R v Howe
• Zecevic v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Victoria)
• Lindsay v The Queen

[See more]

• Gaston v R
• The Queen v Elsy Patricia Calderon De Ortega Barralaga
• De Freitas v The Queen
• Sankar (Lawrence) v The State
• The State v Alfred

FOLLOWED in

• Da Costa v R
• Mat Sawi bin Bahodin v PP
• Lorensus Tukan v Public Prosecutor

CONSIDERED in

• R v Philip Rowland
• Moffa v R
• Glasford Phillips v The Queen

[See more]

• Parker v The Queen
• R v Semini
• The Queen v Munesh Kumar
• The Queen v Teklemariam Abebe
• Graham Lofty v The Queen
• R v Gordon Christopher Cox
• R v Lees
• The Queen v Michael Erik Gonzalez Leonboyer
• Peniamina v The Queen
• Sankar v State of Trinidad and Tobago
• Dayal v State
• Mencarious v R
• R v Ruth Ellis
• Deshan Rampharry v The State
• Attorney General's Reference (Nos. 74, 95 and 118 of 2002); R v Suratan; R v Humes, R v Wilkinson
• Dennis Peter Holley v The Attorney General
• Parker v The Queen
• Pollock v R
• The Queen v Elsy Patricia Calderon De Ortega Barralaga
• Hamilton v R
• Edwards (Cyrille) v The State of Dominica
• R v John Francisco De Freitas
• R v Samuel Moxam
• Mitchell v The State
• Smith (Keith) v R
• Hosein v R
• Pinto v The State
• Lett v R
• Mason v R
• The State v Mitchell
• Shalto (Leroy) v The State
• Edwards v The State
• Smith v The Queen
• DPP v MacEoin
• Fox v the Queen
• Public Prosecutor v Kwan Cin Cheng
• Holley v AG
• Mcintosh v R
• R v Smith (Morgan James)
• Adrian Nicholas Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• R v Morhall
• Barry v The State
• R v Camplin

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 62 TLR 466
• [1946] 2 All ER 124
• [1946] AC 588

CLARIFIED in

• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R

This document cites

---

• Holmes v DPP