Stingel v R

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Woolmington v DPP
• Johnson v R
• Holmes v DPP

CONSIDERS

• Moffa v R
• Parker v The Queen
• Mchale v Watson (no 2)

[See more]

• Packett v R

CITES

• DPP v Newbury ; DPP v Jones
• R v Palmer
• R v Camplin

[See more]

• Van Den Hoek v R
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 171 CLR 312
• [1990] 97 ALR 1

REFERRED in

• Arrowsmith v R
• Mcghee v R
• Dayal v State

[See more]

• R v Clinton (1), Parker (2) and Evans (3)
• DPP v McNamara

CONSIDERED in

• Masciantonio v R
• Pollock v R
• R v Mankotia

[See more]

• R v Szabo
• Lindsay v The Queen
• Stevens v R
• Ziha v R
• Rogers v R
• Braysich v The Queen
• Tyne, Alan Cecil v Tasmania
• R v Wilson (No 4)
• R v Farhad Qaumi
• R v Songcuan (No. 3)
• R (Crown) v Ian Robert Turnbull (Accused)
• R v Maglovski (No 2)
• Fantakis v R
• Paul Darren Mulvihill(Applicant) v R
• Heron v R
• Donnellan v Min for Justice and Others
• Walker v Howard

APPLIED in

• Taiapa v The Queen

CITED in

• Richard Anthony Daniel v The State
• R v Michael Thomas
• Mahmoud Hawi v Crown

This document cites

• DPP v Newbury ; DPP v Jones
• R v Camplin
• Woolmington v DPP
• Parker v The Queen
• Holmes v DPP



See all quotations

• Johnson v R
• Moffa v R
• Van Den Hoek v R
• Packett v R
• R v Palmer
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• Mchale v Watson (no 2)