Lett v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Mills v Stanway Coaches Ltd
• R v Prince
• Holmes v DPP

[See more]

• Bullard v The Queen

CITES

• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• Holmes v DPP

CITED in

• The State v Singh (Clement)
• Spenser (Ryan) and Fraser (Rodewell) v The State

CONSIDERED in

• The State v Lewis
• Francis v R
• Jesse Ryan Mark Rooplal v Comptroller of Customs and Excise

[See more]

• Alphonse v R
• Denis Alphonse Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• The State v Singh

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1963) 6 WIR 92

This document cites

• Holmes v DPP
• Mills v Stanway Coaches Ltd
• Holmes v DPP
• Bullard v The Queen
• R v Prince



See all quotations

• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R