Pinto v The State

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Holmes v DPP
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• Bullard v The Queen

[See more]

• R v Camplin
• R v Lawrence (Stephen)

CITES

• Bedder v DPP
• R v Camplin
• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen

[See more]

• R v Lawrence (Stephen)
• Mason v R
• Hosein v R
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• DPP v Walker
• Palmer v R
• DPP v Leary Walker
• McGreevy v DPP

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• (1986) 40 WIR 342

CITED in

• Shalto (Leroy) v The State
• Guerra (Lincoln) and Wallen (Brian) v The State (No 2)
• Sankar (Lawrence) v The State

[See more]

• Diaz (Anthony) v The State
• Berthill Fox Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Wilson Exhale Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]

CONSIDERED in

• Deon Jacobs Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
• Sandy v R
• Jacobs v The Queen

[See more]

• Symmetry (Trinidad) Ltd v The Attorney General of Trinidad
• Symmetry (trinidad) Ltd v The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• Samuel v R

This document cites

• Bedder v DPP
• R v Lawrence (Stephen)
• R v Camplin
• R v Camplin
• R v Lawrence (Stephen)



See all quotations

• McGreevy v DPP
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• Palmer v The Queen; Irving v The Queen
• Holmes v DPP
• DPP v Walker
• Bullard v The Queen
• Palmer v R
• DPP v Leary Walker
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• Hosein v R
• Mason v R