Johnson v R

Core Citations

---

DISTINGUISHES

• Pemble v R

REFERS TO

• R v Lesbini
• R v Welsh
• Holmes v DPP

[See more]

• Leach v The King
• Kwaku Mensah v The King

CONSIDERS

• R v Duffy (Note)
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• Attorney General for Ceylon v Kumarasinghege Don John Perera

[See more]

• Parker v The Queen
• Da Costa v R
• Mancini v DPP
• Phillips v The Queen

CITES

• Packett v R
• Commonwealth v District Court of the Metropolitan District
• R v Hall

[See more]

• R v Pierre Ayes

FOLLOWS

• Woolmington v DPP

ADOPTS

• R v John Thomas

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 136 CLR 619
• 11 ALR 23

CITED in

• Kolalich v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Nsw)

REFERRED in

• R v Falconer
• Stingel v R
• Veen v R

CONSIDERED in

• Ziha v R
• Braysich v The Queen
• R v Songcuan (No. 3)

[See more]

• Heron v R
• Pollock v R
• Lindsay v The Queen
• Archer v Cox (Police Constable)

This document cites

---

• Mancini v DPP
• Woolmington v DPP
• R v Welsh
• Kwaku Mensah v The King
• Parker v The Queen



See all quotations

• R v Duffy (Note)
• Attorney General for Ceylon v Kumarasinghege Don John Perera
• Holmes v DPP
• Packett v R
• Commonwealth v District Court of the Metropolitan District
• Da Costa v R
• Pemble v R
• R v John Thomas
• R v Hall
• Phillips v The Queen
• Leach v The King
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• R v Pierre Ayes
• R v Lesbini