Pollock v R

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Holmes v DPP
• Boughey v R
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R

[See more]

• Mancini v DPP
• R v Duffy (Note)
• R v Ahluwalia
• Masciantonio v R
• Parker v The Queen
• R v Jervis
• Parker v The Queen
• Moffa v R
• Van Den Hoek v R
• The Queen v LK
• Johnson v R
• Pemble v R
• Kaporonovski v R
• Alford v Magee
• Stingel v R

CITES

• R v Lesbini

CONSIDERED in

• Mark James Graham v The Queen
• Senior Constable Andrew Rich v Jeremy Holcombe
• Ziha v R

[See more]

• Rogers v R
• OKS v Western Australia
• Rodi v Western Australia
• The Queen v Getachew
• Hargraves v The Queen
• Lane v The Queen
• Kalbasi v Western Australia
• Filippou v The Queen
• Harafias v R
• Collins v The Queen

REFERRED in

• Public Prosecutor v Subir Gole

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2011] 3 LRC 454

CITED in

• Lindsay v The Queen

This document cites

• The Queen v LK
• Mancini v DPP
• Parker v The Queen
• R v Duffy (Note)
• Holmes v DPP



See all quotations

• Johnson v R
• Moffa v R
• R v Jervis
• Boughey v R
• Van Den Hoek v R
• Stingel v R
• Masciantonio v R
• Alford v Magee
• Pemble v R
• R v Harvey
• Kaporonovski v R
• Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v The Queen; Lee Chun-Chuen alias Lee Wing-Cheuk v R
• R v Ahluwalia
• Parker v The Queen
• R v Lesbini