Gollins v Gollins

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)
• Hall v Hall

[See more]

• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Frere
• Buchler v Buchler
• King v King
• Waters v Waters

REFERS TO

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Barnett v Barnett, Brown intervening
• Knott v Knott

[See more]

• Timmins v Timmins
• Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v Haynes
• Woollard v Woollard
• Fowler v Fowler
• Evans v Evans
• King v King
• Walker v Walker
• Ingram v Ingram
• Horton v Horton
• Kelly v Kelly
• Carpenter v Carpenter
• Swan v Swan

FOLLOWS

• Hadden v Hadden
• Eastland v Eastland
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Gollins v Gollins

APPLIES

• Lauder v Lauder
• Jamieson v Jamieson

CITES

• Allen v Allen
• Warburton v Warburton
• Cackett (Orse. Trice) v Cackett

[See more]

• Ivens v Ivens

DISTINGUISHES

• Lang v Lang

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Proceedings (Magistrates' Courts) Act 1960 - Articles : S-1
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895
• Matrimonial Proceedings (Magistrates' Courts) Act 1960

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1962] 3 All ER 897
• [1962] 3 WLR 1344
• [1964] P 32

CONSIDERED in

• Ruby May Evans v Charles Evans
• Ruby May Evans v Charles Evans
• Llewelyn v Llewelyn

[See more]

• Joan Mary Asquith (Petitioner) v Eric Lees Asquith
• Barrow v Barrow
• Roe v Roe
• Braham, M.v (Appellant Wife) v Braham, P. (Respondent Husband)
• Birch v Birch
• Sheldon v Sheldon
• Cms Petitioner v Rgs Respondent
• Tini Owens v Hugh John Owens

REFERRED in

• Priday v Priday
• Thurlow v Thurlow
• O'Neill v O'Neill

[See more]

• Evans v Evans
• Ogden v Ogden
• Koh Teng Lam v Koh Chen Chee Elsie and Another
• Ng v Lim

APPLIED in

• Thurlow v Thurlow
• Stanwick v Stanwick

CITED in

• Oren and another v Red Box Toy Factory Ltd and Others; Same v Martin Yaffe International Ltd and another
• Pheasant v Pheasant
• Ash v Ash

[See more]

• Isaac Oren v Red Box Toy Factory Ltd

FOLLOWED in

• Elsie Koh Chen Chee and Another; Koh Teng Lam
• Lim v Ng

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Gollins v Gollins

This document cites

---

• Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)
• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)
• Timmins v Timmins
• Jamieson v Jamieson
• Qualcast (Wolverhampton) Ltd v Haynes



See all quotations

• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• King v King
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Frere
• Swan v Swan
• Kaslefsky v Kaslefsky
• Kelly v Kelly
• Lauder v Lauder
• Knott v Knott
• Buchler v Buchler
• Fowler v Fowler
• Evans v Evans
• Cackett (Orse. Trice) v Cackett
• Carpenter v Carpenter
• Ingram v Ingram
• Waters v Waters
• Barnett v Barnett, Brown intervening
• Walker v Walker
• Hadden v Hadden
• King v King
• Ivens v Ivens
• Allen v Allen
• Warburton v Warburton
• Horton v Horton
• Lang v Lang
• Woollard v Woollard
• Eastland v Eastland
• Hall v Hall
• Matrimonial Proceedings (Magistrates' Courts) Act 1960
• Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1895