King v King

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• King v King

APPLIES

• Usmar v Usmar
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas

CITES

• Squire v Squire

CRITICISES

• Horton v Horton

COMMENTS

• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)

REVERSES

• King v King

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1952] UKHL J0731-2
• 2 TLR 429
• [1952] 2 All ER 584

[See more]

• [1953] AC 124

CONSIDERED in

• Kelly v Kelly
• Procope v Procope
• Gollins v Gollins

REFERRED in

• Crump v Crump
• Ward v Ward
• Wright v Wright

[See more]

• Knott v Knott
• Elsie Koh Chen Chee and Another; Koh Teng Lam
• Gollins v Gollins
• Perkins (Née Routier) v Perkins
• Bond v Bond
• Waters v Waters

FOLLOWED in

• Elsie Koh Chen Chee and Another; Koh Teng Lam

APPLIED in

• Jones (Neé Ludlow) v Jones
• Windeatt v Windeatt (No. 2)

CITED in

• Ash v Ash

This document cites

---

• Earl Russell v Countess Russell (Cross Appeal)
• Watt (or Thomas) v Thomas
• Squire v Squire
• King v King
• Usmar v Usmar



See all quotations

• Horton v Horton