Pheasant v Pheasant

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Divorce Reform Act 1969 - Articles : S-2

REFERS TO

• Ash v Ash
• Goodrich v Goodrich

CITES

• Gollins v Gollins
• Squire v Squire

APPLIES

• Lissack v Lissack

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Livingstone-Stallard v Livingstone-Stallard

APPLIED in

• Richards v Richards

REFERRED in

• Hariram Jayaram v Saraswathy Rajahram
• Vkr v Nnt
• Sharonlee Eileen Evans Haire v James Benton Haire

[See more]

• Castello Ana Paula Costa Fusillier v Lobo Carlos Manuel Rosado
• Irvin Moses Petitioner v Lynne Elizabeth Moses Respondent
• Owens v Owens

FOLLOWED in

• Hariram Jayaram v Saraswathy Rajahram

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 587
• [1972] 2 WLR 353
• [1972] Fam 202

CONSIDERED in

• Katz v Katz
• DT v CG
• Kendall Owin Dornellien v Dyane Dornellien (nee Sebastian)

[See more]

• Mohan Budhan Petitioner v Dhanwantie Bhagoo-Budhan Respondent
• Allen v Allen
• Margarita Myrtle Louis-Octave v Hamilton Octave

CITED in

• Cms Petitioner v Rgs Respondent
• Mohan Budhan Petitioner v Dhanwantie Bhagoo-Budhan Respondent

This document cites

---

• Gollins v Gollins
• Goodrich v Goodrich
• Lissack v Lissack
• Ash v Ash
• Squire v Squire



See all quotations

• Divorce Reform Act 1969